S M Keller1, S Adak, H Wagner, D H Johnson. 1. Department of Surgery, The Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York 10003, USA. skeller@bethisraelny.org
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) is an integral part of surgery for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To compare the impact of systematic sampling (SS) and complete MLND on the identification of mediastinal lymph node metastases and patient survival, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) stratified patients by type of MLND before participation in ECOG 3590 (a randomized prospective trial of adjuvant therapy in patients with completely resected stages II and IIIa NSCLC). METHODS: Eligibility requirements for study entry included a thorough investigation of the mediastinal lymph nodes with either SS or complete MLND. The former was defined as removal of at least one lymph node at levels 4, 7, and 10 during a right thoracotomy and at levels 5 and/or 6 and 7 during a left thoracotomy, while the latter required complete removal of all lymph nodes at those levels. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-three eligible patients were accrued to the study. Among the 187 patients who underwent SS, N1 disease was identified in 40% and N2 disease in 60%. This was not significantly different than the 41% of N1 disease and 59% of N2 disease found among the 186 patients who underwent complete MLND. Among the 222 patients with N2 metastases, multiple levels of N2 disease were documented in 30% of patients who underwent complete MLND and in 12% of patients who had SS (p = 0.001). Median survival was 57.5 months for those patients who had undergone complete MLND and 29.2 months for those patients who had SS (p = 0.004). However, the survival advantage was limited to patients with right lung tumors (66.4 months vs 24.5 months, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this nonrandomized comparison, SS was as efficacious as complete MLND in staging patients with NSCLC. However, complete MLND identified significantly more levels of N2 disease. Furthermore, complete MLND was associated with improved survival with right NSCLC when compared with SS.
BACKGROUND: Mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) is an integral part of surgery for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To compare the impact of systematic sampling (SS) and complete MLND on the identification of mediastinal lymph node metastases and patient survival, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) stratified patients by type of MLND before participation in ECOG 3590 (a randomized prospective trial of adjuvant therapy in patients with completely resected stages II and IIIa NSCLC). METHODS: Eligibility requirements for study entry included a thorough investigation of the mediastinal lymph nodes with either SS or complete MLND. The former was defined as removal of at least one lymph node at levels 4, 7, and 10 during a right thoracotomy and at levels 5 and/or 6 and 7 during a left thoracotomy, while the latter required complete removal of all lymph nodes at those levels. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-three eligible patients were accrued to the study. Among the 187 patients who underwent SS, N1 disease was identified in 40% and N2 disease in 60%. This was not significantly different than the 41% of N1 disease and 59% of N2 disease found among the 186 patients who underwent complete MLND. Among the 222 patients with N2 metastases, multiple levels of N2 disease were documented in 30% of patients who underwent complete MLND and in 12% of patients who had SS (p = 0.001). Median survival was 57.5 months for those patients who had undergone complete MLND and 29.2 months for those patients who had SS (p = 0.004). However, the survival advantage was limited to patients with right lung tumors (66.4 months vs 24.5 months, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this nonrandomized comparison, SS was as efficacious as complete MLND in staging patients with NSCLC. However, complete MLND identified significantly more levels of N2 disease. Furthermore, complete MLND was associated with improved survival with right NSCLC when compared with SS.
Authors: Mark W Hennon; Luke H DeGraaff; Adrienne Groman; Todd L Demmy; Sai Yendamuri Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 4.191