Literature DB >> 10969298

Optimal propofol plasma concentration during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in young, middle-aged, and elderly patients.

T Kazama1, K Takeuchi, K Ikeda, T Ikeda, M Kikura, T Iida, S Suzuki, H Hanai, S Sato.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Suitable propofol plasma concentrations during gastroscopy have not been determined for suppressing somatic and hemodynamic responses in different age groups.
METHODS: Propofol sedation at target plasma concentrations from 0.5 to 4.0 microgram/ml were performed randomly in three groups of patients (23 per group) who were undergoing elective outpatient gastroscopy: ages 17-49 yr (group 1), 50-69 yr (group 2), and 70-89 yr (group 3). Plasma propofol concentration in which 50% of patients do not respond to these different stimuli were determined by logistic regression: verbal command (Cp50ls), somatic response to gastroscopy (Cp50endo), and gag response to gastroscopy (Cp50gag). Hemodynamic responses were also investigated in the different age groups.
RESULTS: Cp50ls concentrations were 2.23 microgram/ml (group 1), 1.75 microgram/ml (group 2), and 1.40 microgram/ml (group 3). The Cp50endo values in groups 1 and 2 were 2.87 and 2.34 microgram/ml, respectively, which were significantly higher than their respective Cp50ls values. Cp50endo value in group 3 was 1.64 microgram/ml, which was close to its Cp50ls value. Because of a high degree of interpatient variability, Cp50gag could not be defined. Systolic blood pressure response decreased with increasing propofol concentrations.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors determined the propofol concentration necessary for gastroscopy and showed that increasing age reduces it. Propofol concentration that suppresses somatic response induces loss of consciousness in almost all young patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10969298     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200009000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  14 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopist-directed propofol: pros and cons.

Authors:  Eun Hye Kim; Sang Kil Lee
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2014-03-31

2.  Unexpected pro-injury effect of propofol on vascular smooth muscle cells with increased oxidative stress.

Authors:  Xiaobin Wang; Yunhui Cheng; Xiaojun Liu; Jian Yang; Daisy Munoz; Chunxiang Zhang
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Efficacy and safety of a patient-positioning device (EZ-FIX) for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Seungho Lee; Joung-Ho Han; Hee Seung Lee; Ki Bae Kim; In-Kwang Lee; Eun-Jong Cha; Young Duck Shin; Namgyu Park; Seon Mee Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Long-term high-risk drinking does not change effective doses of propofol for successful insertion of gastroscope in Chinese male patients.

Authors:  Pei-Pei Hao; Tian Tian; Bin Hu; Wei-Chao Liu; Ying-Gui Chen; Tian-Yu Jiang; Fu-Shan Xue
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 2.376

5.  Lipid peroxidation and the use of emulsified propofol in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  A D Manataki; A D Tselepis; G K Glantzounis; H M Arnaoutoglou; E C Tsimoyiannis; N E Stavropoulos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Etomidate plus propofol versus propofol alone for sedation during gastroscopy: a randomized prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Xiang Zhou; Bi-Xi Li; Li-Min Chen; Jun Tao; Sui Zhang; Meng Ji; Ming-Chun Wu; Min Chen; Yan-Hui Zhang; Guo-Shen Gan; Xiao-Yang Song
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Safety and efficacy of combined use of propofol and etomidate for sedation during gastroscopy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lingyuan Chen; Xueyan Liang; Xinmei Tan; Haibin Wen; Junsong Jiang; Yan Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Propofol lipidic infusion promotes resistance to antifungals by reducing drug input into the fungal cell.

Authors:  Sofia Costa-de-Oliveira; Ricardo Araujo; Ana Silva-Dias; Cidália Pina-Vaz; Acácio Gonçalves Rodrigues
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 9.  Clinical pharmacology in old persons.

Authors:  Paul A F Jansen; Jacobus R B J Brouwers
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2012-07-28

10.  Optimal effect-site concentration of propofol for tracheal suctioning during emergence from ophthalmic surgery.

Authors:  Nan-Kai Hung; Meei-Shyuan Lee; Hou-Chuan Lai; Yi-Hsuan Huang; Bo-Feng Lin; Shun-Ming Chan; Zhi-Fu Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.