Literature DB >> 10969293

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of inhaled versus intravenous morphine in healthy volunteers.

M Dershwitz1, J L Walsh, R J Morishige, P M Connors, R M Rubsamen, S L Shafer, C E Rosow.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A new pulmonary drug delivery system produces aerosols from disposable packets of medication. This study compared the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of morphine delivered by an AERx prototype with intravenous morphine.
METHODS: Fifteen healthy volunteers were enrolled. Two subjects were administered four inhalations of 2.2 mg morphine each at 1-min intervals or 4.4 mg over 3 min by intravenous infusion. Thirteen subjects were given twice the above doses, i.e., eight inhalations or 8.8 mg intravenously over 7 min. Arterial blood sampling was performed every minute during administration and at 2, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, and 240 min after administration. The effect of morphine was assessed by measuring pupil diameter and ventilatory response to a hypercapnic challenge. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses were performed simultaneously using mixed-effect models.
RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic data after intravenous administration were described by a three-exponent decay model preceded by a lag time. The pharmacokinetic model for administration by inhalation consisted of the three-exponent intravenous pharmacokinetic model preceded by a two-exponent absorption model. The authors found that, with administration by inhalation, the total bioavailability was 59%, of which 43% was absorbed almost instantaneously and 57% was absorbed with a half-life of 18 min. The median times to the half-maximal miotic effects of morphine were 10 and 5.5 min after inhalation and intravenous administration, respectively (P < 0.01). The pharmacodynamic parameter ke0 was approximately 0.003 min-1.
CONCLUSIONS: The onset and duration of the effects of morphine are similar after intravenous administration or inhalation via this new pulmonary drug delivery system. Morphine bioavailability after such administration is 59% of the dose loaded into the dosage form.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10969293     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200009000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  25 in total

1.  Evaluation of the AERx pulmonary delivery system for systemic delivery of a poorly soluble selective D-1 agonist, ABT-431.

Authors:  Franklin W Okumu; Rai-Yun Lee; James D Blanchard; Anthony Queirolo; Christine M Woods; Peter M Lloyd; Jerry Okikawa; Igor Gonda; Stephen J Farr; Reid Rubsamen; Akwete L Adjei; Richard J Bertz
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Abuse-Deterrent Opioid Formulations: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations.

Authors:  Carmen Walter; Claudia Knothe; Jörn Lötsch
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Investigations into the fate of inhaled salmon calcitonin at the respiratory epithelial barrier.

Authors:  Leonie Baginski; Frederic Tewes; Stephen T Buckley; Anne Marie Healy; Udo Bakowsky; Carsten Ehrhardt
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  Pharmacometric Models for Characterizing the Pharmacokinetics of Orally Inhaled Drugs.

Authors:  Jens Markus Borghardt; Benjamin Weber; Alexander Staab; Charlotte Kloft
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  Computational framework for predictive PBPK-PD-Tox simulations of opioids and antidotes.

Authors:  Carrie German; Minu Pilvankar; Andrzej Przekwas
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 2.745

6.  Fatal respiratory depression after multiple intravenous morphine injections.

Authors:  Jörn Lötsch; Rafael Dudziak; Rainer Freynhagen; Jürgen Marschner; Gerd Geisslinger
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling of the effects of axomadol and its O-demethyl metabolite on pupil diameter and nociception in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Víctor Mangas-Sanjuan; José Martín Pastor; Jens Rengelshausen; Roberta Bursi; Iñaki F Troconiz
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Intraoperative methadone: rediscovery, reappraisal, and reinvigoration?

Authors:  Evan D Kharasch
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Pharmacokinetics and analgesic effects of methadone in children and adults with sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Jennifer Horst; Melissa Frei-Jones; Elena Deych; William Shannon; Evan D Kharasch
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.167

10.  The effect of quinidine, used as a probe for the involvement of P-glycoprotein, on the intestinal absorption and pharmacodynamics of methadone.

Authors:  Evan D Kharasch; Christine Hoffer; Dale Whittington
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.