Literature DB >> 10968893

Should we include anti-prothrombin antibodies in the screening for the antiphospholipid syndrome?

M Galli1.   

Abstract

Anti-prothrombin antibodies belong to the family of the antiphospholipid antibodies. Their prevalence ranges from 50 to 90% of antiphospholipid-positive patients, depending on the laboratory methodology employed for their detection. ELISA techniques are the most commonly used methods for their measurements, which allow a quick determination of their titer and isotype(s). Unfortunately, no well standardized assays are yet commercially available. The clinical relevance of anti-prothrombin antibodies as risk factors for thromboembolic events has been investigated by a number of retrospective and case-control studies. We reviewed 11 studies: data on 1,440 patients and 371 sex- and age-matched controls were available. Seven studies reported a significant association between anti-prothrombin antibodies and thrombosis by univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis was performed in five studies: only two of them confirmed the association. The sensitivity and specificity of anti-prothrombin antibodies for thrombosis were analysed according to the antibody isotype and to the arterial and/or venous site of thrombosis. The sensitivities are disappointingly low, particularly when the M isotype and arterial thrombosis are considered, whereas the specificities are somewhat better, even though they range widely. These data do not allow to recommend the measurement of anti-prothrombin antibodies in the routine laboratory workout of antiphospholipid-positive patients in order to define their thrombotic risk. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10968893     DOI: 10.1006/jaut.2000.0413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Autoimmun        ISSN: 0896-8411            Impact factor:   7.094


  8 in total

Review 1.  Update on the management of the pregnant patient with antiphospholipid antibody.

Authors:  L R Sammaritano
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Antibodies to C reactive protein.

Authors:  B J Rosenau; P H Schur
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 3.  The prevalence and clinical significance of antiphospholipid antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Ewa Olech; Joan T Merrill
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 4.  Recent advances in the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome.

Authors:  Hyun-Sook Chi
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 5.  Antiphospholipid syndrome.

Authors:  Sanjay C Keswani; Naresh Chauhan
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 18.000

Review 6.  Antiphospholipid antibodies: paradigm in transition.

Authors:  Lawrence L Horstman; Wenche Jy; Carlos J Bidot; Yeon S Ahn; Roger E Kelley; Robert Zivadinov; Amir H Maghzi; Masoud Etemadifar; Seyed Ali Mousavi; Alireza Minagar
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 8.322

7.  Rational Laboratory Diagnostics of Antiphospholipid Antibodies: Anti-Cardiolipin, Anti-β2-Glycoprotein I, Anti-Prothrombin and Anti-Annexin V Antibodies.

Authors:  Bozic Borut; Sasa Cucnik; Natasa Gaspersic; Ales Ambrozic; Tanja Kveder; Blaz Rozman
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2010-01-26

8.  Profiles of criteria and non-criteria anti-phospholipid autoantibodies are associated with clinical phenotypes of the antiphospholipid syndrome.

Authors:  Ilan Volkov; Luciana Seguro; Elaine P Leon; László Kovács; Dirk Roggenbuck; Peter Schierack; Boris Gilburd; Andrea Doria; Maria G Tektonidou; Nancy Agmon-Levin
Journal:  Auto Immun Highlights       Date:  2020-05-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.