Literature DB >> 10968114

A comparison between the pregnancy outcome of women with gestation diabetes treated with glibenclamide and those treated with insulin.

J M Lim1, Y Tayob, P M O'Brien, R W Shaw.   

Abstract

The pregnancy outcome of 33 women with gestational diabetes who were treated with glibenclamide and changed to insulin if glibenclamide failed, were compared with the pregnancy outcome of 21 women with gestational diabetes treated conventionally with insulin. The pregnancy outcome, with regard to the overall glycaemic control, rates of preterm labour, neonatal hypoglycaemia, fetal macrosomia, perinatal morbidity and mortality, were not statistically different between the two treatment groups. The limited number of women studied, and the non-random allocation of these women to each treatment group however, could have influenced these results. There were a few observed differences in the pregnancy outcome between the two treatment groups, which although were not statistically significant, caused some concern. In particular we noted an increased rate of fetal macrosomia in the glibenclamide treated group, which in theory could have been drug mediated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 10968114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Malaysia        ISSN: 0300-5283


  4 in total

Review 1.  Using oral agents to manage gestational diabetes: what have we learned?

Authors:  Elizabeth Buschur; Florence Brown; Jennifer Wyckoff
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.810

2.  Gestational diabetes mellitus: Non-insulin management.

Authors:  Navneet Magon; V Seshiah
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-10

3.  Could Metformin Manage Gestational Diabetes Mellitus instead of Insulin?

Authors:  Hend S Saleh; Walid A Abdelsalam; Hala E Mowafy; Azza A Abd ElHameid
Journal:  Int J Reprod Med       Date:  2016-08-14

Review 4.  Management of sulfonylurea-treated monogenic diabetes in pregnancy: implications of placental glibenclamide transfer.

Authors:  M Shepherd; A J Brook; A J Chakera; A T Hattersley
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.359

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.