Literature DB >> 10966956

Effects of artefacts on scanning laser polarimetry of retinal nerve fibre layer thickness measurement.

S Kogure1, T Chiba, T Kinoshita, H Kowa, S Tsukahara.   

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the effects of artefacts on scanning laser polarimetry of the retinal nerve fibre layer.
METHODS: Six eyes of six normal volunteers and an artificial nerve fibre layer were examined using the nerve fibre analyser II. The retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (RNFLT) was measured in each of four 90 degree quadrants, superior (S), temporal (T), inferior (I), and nasal (N), at 1.5 disc diameters from the disc margin. Study 1: Measurement in normal eyes. The amount of maximum error in RNFLT measurements was investigated as follows: (1) the intensity setting of the laser beam was changed to be as weak as possible or to be as strong as possible; (2) the intentional offsets of the laser beam axis in relation to the pupil were made in four directions; (3) the eye was rotated by shifting the head 45 or 90 degrees; (4) the right eye was measured by moving it to the left eye position on the head rest. Study 2: Measurements on an artificial nerve fibre layer. The birefringence measurements were confirmed with a plastic disc, which has a radial arrangement of birefringence. The plastic disc with black paper was fixed at the right eye position or the left eye position on the head rest. The retardation of the laser beam by the plastic disc on the black paper was measured. The retardation of the plastic disc was checked by an automatic birefringence evaluation system (ABR-10A, Uniopt Co, Ltd, Shizuoka).
RESULTS: Study 1: The effects of the rotated eye and the measurement of the opposite eye position were significant. The eyes rotated 90 degrees showed quite a different pattern in which the thicker and thinner locations of the RNFLT are switched. The nasal RNFLT of the baseline and the 90 degree rotated eye are 41.9 (SD 6.0) microm and 122.5 (11.2) microm, respectively (p<0.0001, Scheffe multiple comparison test). Study 2: The uniform retardation of the plastic disc was observed with the ABR-10A. The NFA detects the retardation of the plastic disc which the retardation map showed as a double humped pattern.
CONCLUSIONS: Study 2 indicated that the amount of corneal compensation was not small. The cause of significant influences by the rotated eyes and right eyes measurement in left eye position were thought to be incorrect corneal compensation. To increase the diagnostic ability of SLP, an improved compensation of the cornea is thought to be important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10966956      PMCID: PMC1723630          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.84.9.1013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  9 in total

1.  Retinal nerve fibre layer polarimetry: histological and clinical comparison.

Authors:  J E Morgan; A Waldock; G Jeffery; A Cowey
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Detection of glaucoma with scanning laser polarimetry.

Authors:  R N Weinreb; L Zangwill; C C Berry; R Bathija; P A Sample
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-12

3.  Scanning laser polarimetry of the retinal nerve fibre layer in primary open angle and capsular glaucoma.

Authors:  G Holló; I Süveges; A Nagymihály; P Vargha
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Nerve fibre layer thickness measurements derived by scanning laser polarimetry: the jury is out.

Authors:  C Hudson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Variation of nerve fibre layer thickness measurements with age and ethnicity by scanning laser polarimetry.

Authors:  D Poinoosawmy; L Fontana; J X Wu; F W Fitzke; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Histopathologic validation of Fourier-ellipsometry measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness.

Authors:  R N Weinreb; A W Dreher; A Coleman; H Quigley; B Shaw; K Reiter
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-04

7.  Retinal nerve fiber layer assessment by scanning laser polarimetry and standardized photography.

Authors:  A G Niessen; T J Van Den Berg; C T Langerhorst; E L Greve
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Reproducibility of retardation measurements with the nerve fiber analyzer II.

Authors:  L Zangwill; C A Berry; V S Garden; R N Weinreb
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Scanning laser polarimetry to measure the nerve fiber layer of normal and glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  R N Weinreb; S Shakiba; L Zangwill
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.258

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Influence of post-LASIK corneal healing on scanning laser polarimetric measurement of the retinal nerve fibre layer thickness.

Authors:  G Holló; Z Z Nagy; P Vargha; I Süveges
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Influence of LASIK on scanning laser polarimetric measurement of the retinal nerve fibre layer with fixed angle and customised corneal polarisation compensation.

Authors:  G Holló; A Katsanos; P Kóthy; A Kerek; I Süveges
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Optical coherence tomography analysis of axonal loss in band atrophy of the optic nerve.

Authors:  M L R Monteiro; B C Leal; A A M Rosa; M D Bronstein
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Quantitative analysis of axonal loss in band atrophy of the optic nerve using scanning laser polarimetry.

Authors:  M L R Monteiro; F A Medeiros; M R Ostroscki
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Study of retinal nerve fibre layer thickness in eyes with high tension glaucoma and hemifield defect.

Authors:  M S Kook; K Sung; S Kim; R Park; W Kang
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.638

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.