Literature DB >> 10966562

Subclassifying atypical urinary cytology specimens.

A A Renshaw1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Subclassifying atypical gynecologic Papanicolaou smears successfully stratifies patients for risk of a significant underlying lesion. Subclassifying atypical urine cytology specimens also may be of value.
METHODS: A literature review and summary of personal experience with urine cytology specimens were performed.
RESULTS: Although a wide range of atypical urinary specimens exists, most can be categorized into a limited number of patterns. Different patterns are associated with different levels of risk for either low grade or high grade urothelial neoplasms.
CONCLUSIONS: Subclassification of urinary cytology specimens may be of value in stratifying patients for their risk of either low grade or high grade urothelial carcinoma. Awareness of these patterns may aid in evaluating urinary cytology specimens. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) Copyright 2000 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10966562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  8 in total

Review 1.  Update for the practicing pathologist: The International Consultation On Urologic Disease-European association of urology consultation on bladder cancer.

Authors:  Mahul B Amin; Steven C Smith; Victor E Reuter; Jonathan I Epstein; David J Grignon; Donna E Hansel; Oscar Lin; Jesse K McKenney; Rodolfo Montironi; Gladell P Paner; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; Ferran Algaba; Syed Ali; Isabel Alvarado-Cabrero; Lukas Bubendorf; Liang Cheng; John C Cheville; Glen Kristiansen; Richard J Cote; Brett Delahunt; John N Eble; Elizabeth M Genega; Christian Gulmann; Arndt Hartmann; Cord Langner; Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Jorda Merce; George J Netto; Esther Oliva; Priya Rao; Jae Y Ro; John R Srigley; Satish K Tickoo; Toyonori Tsuzuki; Saleem A Umar; Theo Van der Kwast; Robert H Young; Mark S Soloway
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Fluorescence Emitted by Papanicolaou-Stained Urothelial Cells Improves Sensitivity of Urinary Conventional Cytology for Detection of Urothelial Tumors.

Authors:  Kinan Drak Alsibai; Ghislaine Daste; Sophie Ferlicot; Monique Fabre; Karine Steenkeste; Julia Salleron; Yacine Hammoudi; Marie-Pierre Fontaine-Aupart; Pascal Eschwege
Journal:  World J Oncol       Date:  2020-10-15

3.  Diagnostic significance of atypical category in the voided urine samples: A retrospective study in a tertiary care center.

Authors:  Ghadeer A Mokhtar; Mohamed Al-Dousari; Doaa Al-Ghamedi
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2010-09

4.  The influence of urine cytology on our practice.

Authors:  Mahmoud Alameddine; Anmar Nassir
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2012-05

5.  Malignant atypical cell in urine cytology: a diagnostic dilemma.

Authors:  Alka Bhatia; Pranab Dey; Nandita Kakkar; Radhika Srinivasan; Raje Nijhawan
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 2.091

6.  Comparative study of ProEx C immunocytochemistry and UroVysion fluorescent in-situ hybridization assays on urine cytology specimens.

Authors:  Sue Chang; Elaine Smith; Mary Levin; Jian-Yu Rao; Neda A Moatamed
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.091

7.  Interobserver reproducibility of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology.

Authors:  Theresa Long; Lester J Layfield; Magda Esebua; Shellaine R Frazier; D Tamar Giorgadze; Robert L Schmidt
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 2.091

8.  Comparison of Diagnostic Performances of Urine Cytology Before and After the Use of The Paris System Criteria: An Institutional Experience from Turkey.

Authors:  Sevgen Onder; Olcay Kurtulan; Altan Kavuncuoglu; Bulent Akdogan
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 1.000

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.