BACKGROUND: Patients' viewpoint of their health status is increasingly used as an important outcome measure of the success of treatments. Because clinicians rarely formally measure patients' health-related quality of life, the question arises whether noninvasive testing for ischemia can provide similar information regarding physical functioning and general health perception. METHODS: We measured physical functioning and general health status with the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) survey in 195 consecutive patients (68% male, mean age 55.6 +/- 11.1 years) referred for exercise testing with myocardial perfusion imaging. The survey was completed immediately before the exercise test. RESULTS: In the multivariate analysis, the strongest predictor of physical functioning and general health perception was metabolic equivalents. However, the best model, including demographic, clinical, and test variables, predicted only 14% of the variation in physical functioning and 10% of the variability in general health perception. CONCLUSIONS: The variation in physical functioning and general health perception, as measured by the SF-36, among patients referred for exercise testing is not predicted well by the results of the test. As expected, several test results are significantly associated with physical functioning and general health perception; however, there was substantial overlap among individual patients, suggesting that the parameters are poor surrogates for the actual assessment of the domains. If these domains are deemed important to tracking patient outcomes, then they should supplement the current assessments of these patients.
BACKGROUND:Patients' viewpoint of their health status is increasingly used as an important outcome measure of the success of treatments. Because clinicians rarely formally measure patients' health-related quality of life, the question arises whether noninvasive testing for ischemia can provide similar information regarding physical functioning and general health perception. METHODS: We measured physical functioning and general health status with the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) survey in 195 consecutive patients (68% male, mean age 55.6 +/- 11.1 years) referred for exercise testing with myocardial perfusion imaging. The survey was completed immediately before the exercise test. RESULTS: In the multivariate analysis, the strongest predictor of physical functioning and general health perception was metabolic equivalents. However, the best model, including demographic, clinical, and test variables, predicted only 14% of the variation in physical functioning and 10% of the variability in general health perception. CONCLUSIONS: The variation in physical functioning and general health perception, as measured by the SF-36, among patients referred for exercise testing is not predicted well by the results of the test. As expected, several test results are significantly associated with physical functioning and general health perception; however, there was substantial overlap among individual patients, suggesting that the parameters are poor surrogates for the actual assessment of the domains. If these domains are deemed important to tracking patient outcomes, then they should supplement the current assessments of these patients.
Authors: Yevgeniy Khariton; Sophia Airhart; Adam C Salisbury; John A Spertus; Kensey L Gosch; J Aaron Grantham; Dimitrios Karmpaliotis; Jeffrey W Moses; William J Nicholson; David J Cohen; William Lombardi; James Sapontis; James M McCabe Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Kelly V Liang; Francis Pike; Christos Argyropoulos; Lisa Weissfeld; Jeffrey Teuteberg; Mary Amanda Dew; Mark L Unruh Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2011-05-06 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Krishna K Patel; Femina S Patel; Timothy M Bateman; Kevin F Kennedy; Poghni A Peri-Okonny; A Iain McGhie; Brett W Sperry; Leslee Shaw; Marcelo Di Carli; Randall C Thompson; Ibrahim M Saeed; Philip G Jones; John A Spertus Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2022-02-15 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Bernice Ruo; John S Rumsfeld; Mark A Hlatky; Haiying Liu; Warren S Browner; Mary A Whooley Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-07-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Martin Reriani; Andreas J Flammer; Jessica Duhé; Jing Li; Rajiv Gulati; Charanjit S Rihal; Ryan Lennon; Jonella M Tilford; Abhiram Prasad; Lilach O Lerman; Amir Lerman Journal: Open Heart Date: 2019-02-02
Authors: Bjørg Ulvik; Ottar Nygård; Berit R Hanestad; Tore Wentzel-Larsen; Astrid K Wahl Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2008-05-29 Impact factor: 3.186