OBJECTIVE: To validate sampling techniques (tracheobronchial aspirates, protected specimen brush, and bronchoalveolar lavage, both conventional and protected) for the detection of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and causative microorganisms according to different histologic and microbiological references. DESIGN: Immediate, multiple bilateral lung biopsy, postmortem study. SETTING: Respiratory intensive care unit of a 1,000-bed teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-five mechanically ventilated patients (>72 hrs) who died in our intensive care unit. MEASUREMENTS: Lung tissue histologic examination and quantitative cultures (16 specimens/patient). The following four references for the diagnostic techniques were used: histology of guided lung biopsy, histology of blind lung biopsy, combined guided and blind lung biopsy histology and microbiology of lung tissue, and microbiology of lung tissue. RESULTS: Sensitivities when histologic reference tests were used ranged from 16% to almost 40%, whereas specificity rates were always <80%. When we combined both lung histology of guided or blind specimens and microbiology of lung tissue, all diagnostic techniques achieved considerably higher but still limited diagnostic yields (sensitivity range 43% to 83%; specificity range 67% to 91%). Causative organisms were missed in a significant number of cases by all techniques (17% to 83%). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic performances of different diagnostic techniques strongly depend on the reference used. All techniques for detecting VAP are of limited value. Finding a balance between clinical judgment and microbiological results is crucial to appropriately manage patients with VAP.
OBJECTIVE: To validate sampling techniques (tracheobronchial aspirates, protected specimen brush, and bronchoalveolar lavage, both conventional and protected) for the detection of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and causative microorganisms according to different histologic and microbiological references. DESIGN: Immediate, multiple bilateral lung biopsy, postmortem study. SETTING: Respiratory intensive care unit of a 1,000-bed teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-five mechanically ventilated patients (>72 hrs) who died in our intensive care unit. MEASUREMENTS: Lung tissue histologic examination and quantitative cultures (16 specimens/patient). The following four references for the diagnostic techniques were used: histology of guided lung biopsy, histology of blind lung biopsy, combined guided and blind lung biopsy histology and microbiology of lung tissue, and microbiology of lung tissue. RESULTS: Sensitivities when histologic reference tests were used ranged from 16% to almost 40%, whereas specificity rates were always <80%. When we combined both lung histology of guided or blind specimens and microbiology of lung tissue, all diagnostic techniques achieved considerably higher but still limited diagnostic yields (sensitivity range 43% to 83%; specificity range 67% to 91%). Causative organisms were missed in a significant number of cases by all techniques (17% to 83%). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic performances of different diagnostic techniques strongly depend on the reference used. All techniques for detecting VAP are of limited value. Finding a balance between clinical judgment and microbiological results is crucial to appropriately manage patients with VAP.
Authors: Nilton Brandão da Silva; Lucas Martins; Frederico Martins; José Anflor; Tiago Tonietto; Cristiano Koefender; Paulo G Cardoso; José Moreira Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2007-08-03 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Boris Jung; Nathalie Embriaco; François Roux; Jean-Marie Forel; Didier Demory; Jérôme Allardet-Servent; Samir Jaber; Bernard La Scola; Laurent Papazian Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Roshan Dsouza; Darold R Spillman; Ronit Barkalifa; Guillermo L Monroy; Eric J Chaney; Karen C White; Stephen A Boppart Journal: J Biophotonics Date: 2019-01-22 Impact factor: 3.207
Authors: Luis Fernando Aranha Camargo; Fernando Vinícius De Marco; Carmen Sílvia Valente Barbas; Cristiane Hoelz; Marco Aurélio Scarpinella Bueno; Milton Rodrigues; Verônica Moreira Amado; Raquel Caserta; Marinês Dalla Valle Martino; Jacyr Pasternak; Elias Knobel Journal: Crit Care Date: 2004-10-14 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Shannon M Fernando; Alexandre Tran; Wei Cheng; Michael Klompas; Kwadwo Kyeremanteng; Sangeeta Mehta; Shane W English; John Muscedere; Deborah J Cook; Antoni Torres; Otavio T Ranzani; Alison E Fox-Robichaud; Waleed Alhazzani; Laveena Munshi; Gordon H Guyatt; Bram Rochwerg Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2020-04-18 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Alvaro Rea-Neto; Nazah Cherif M Youssef; Fabio Tuche; Frank Brunkhorst; V Marco Ranieri; Konrad Reinhart; Yasser Sakr Journal: Crit Care Date: 2008-04-21 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Otavio Tavares Ranzani; Daniel Neves Forte; Antonio Carlos Forte; Igor Mimica; Wilma Carvalho Neves Forte Journal: J Bras Pneumol Date: 2016 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.624