Literature DB >> 10965236

Are prior head injuries or diagnostic X-rays associated with glioma in adults? The effects of control selection bias.

M Wrensch1, R Miike, M Lee, J Neuhaus.   

Abstract

The causes of glioma, the most common type of primary malignant brain tumors, are poorly understood. This study compares personal histories of head injury and diagnostic radiation procedures of the head and neck among 476 adults newly diagnosed with glioma in the San Francisco Bay Area between August of 1991 and April of 1994 (82% of all those diagnosed during that time period) with 462 age-, gender-, and ethnicity-frequency-matched controls (63% of those eligible from random digit dialing). In addition, limited information was obtained from 101 controls during a brief telephone interview conducted with controls who declined participation in the lengthy in-person interview. Controls who participated in the full interview were much more likely than controls who only completed the telephone interview to report head injury [odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were 2.3 (1.0-4.9) and 3.0 (1.6-5.8) for women and men, respectively]. The OR for any head injury in cases versus controls who completed the full interview was 0.9. However, OR for any head injury in cases versus both control groups was 1.3, 95% CI (1.0-1.7), and the OR for head injury for which the subject sought medical attention was 1.1, 95% CI (0.8-1.4). Among subjects completing the full interview, cases who responded by self-report were less likely than controls to report prior non-dental head and neck X-rays (OR = 0.7; 95% CI: 0.5-1.0). However, stratification by respondents' history of head injury indicated no difference in history of head and neck X-ray among those without prior head injury; OR 0.9; 95% CI (0.6-1.2). Cases and controls shared a very similar history of dental procedures and frequency of dental visits. These results suggest that head injury requiring medical attention, dental visits, or non-dental diagnostic X-rays to the head and neck are not important contributors to the risk of adult glioma and reveal some of the methodological obstacles encountered in forming convincing conclusions about these risk factors for brain tumors. Copyright 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10965236     DOI: 10.1159/000026261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroepidemiology        ISSN: 0251-5350            Impact factor:   3.282


  10 in total

Review 1.  Brain tumor epidemiology: consensus from the Brain Tumor Epidemiology Consortium.

Authors:  Melissa L Bondy; Michael E Scheurer; Beatrice Malmer; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Faith G Davis; Dora Il'yasova; Carol Kruchko; Bridget J McCarthy; Preetha Rajaraman; Judith A Schwartzbaum; Siegal Sadetzki; Brigitte Schlehofer; Tarik Tihan; Joseph L Wiemels; Margaret Wrensch; Patricia A Buffler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Links between private habits, psychological stress and brain cancer: a case-control pilot study in France.

Authors:  Cécilia Cabaniols; Roch Giorgi; Olivier Chinot; Nabila Ferahta; Valérie Spinelli; Philippe Alla; Maryline Barrie; Marie-Pascale Lehucher-Michel
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 3.  The brain tissue response to surgical injury and its possible contribution to glioma recurrence.

Authors:  Lauriane Hamard; David Ratel; Laurent Selek; François Berger; Boudewijn van der Sanden; Didier Wion
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Medical diagnostic radiation exposures and risk of gliomas.

Authors:  Faith Davis; Dora Il'yasova; Kristin Rankin; Bridget McCarthy; Darell D Bigner
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Post-traumatic glioblastoma multiforme: a case report.

Authors:  Suleyman Coskun; Aysenur Coskun; Nesrin Gursan; Mehmet Dumlu Aydin
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2011-04

6.  Height in adolescence as a risk factor for glioma subtypes: a nationwide retrospective cohort study of 2.2 million subjects.

Authors:  Roi Tschernichovsky; Lior H Katz; Estela Derazne; Matan Ben-Zion Berliner; Maya Simchoni; Hagai Levine; Lital Keinan-Boker; Alexandra Benouaich-Amiel; Andrew A Kanner; Yosef Laviv; Asaf Honig; Elizabeth Dudnik; Tali Siegal; Jacob Mandel; Gilad Twig; Shlomit Yust-Katz
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  The importance of full participation: lessons from a national case-control study.

Authors:  G R Law; A G Smith; E Roman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 8.  Study designs may influence results: the problems with questionnaire-based case-control studies on the epidemiology of glioma.

Authors:  Christoffer Johansen; Joachim Schüz; Anne-Marie Serena Andreasen; Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Diagnostic radiological examinations and risk of intracranial tumours in adults-findings from the Interphone Study.

Authors:  Anssi Auvinen; Elisabeth Cardis; Maria Blettner; Monika Moissonnier; Siegal Sadetzki; Graham Giles; Christoffer Johansen; Anthony Swerdlow; Angus Cook; Sarah Fleming; Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff; Ivano Iavarone; Marie-Elise Parent; Alistair Woodward; Tore Tynes; Mary McBride; Dan Krewski; Maria Feychting; Toru Takebayashi; Bruce Armstrong; Martine Hours; Jack Siemiatycki; Susanna Lagorio; Signe Benzon Larsen; Minouk Schoemaker; Lars Klaeboe; Stefan Lönn; Joachim Schüz
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 9.685

Review 10.  Are Risks From Medical Imaging Still too Small to Be Observed or Nonexistent?

Authors:  Brant A Ulsh
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.658

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.