Literature DB >> 10964639

The Australian National Workplace Health Project: design and baseline findings.

J M Simpson1, B Oldenburg, N Owen, D Harris, T Dobbins, A Salmon, P Vita, J Wilson, J B Saunders.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This paper describes the study design, recruitment, measurement, and initial recruitment outcomes of Australia's largest workplace intervention trial, the National Workplace Health Project.
METHODS: This was a cluster-randomized trial of socio-behavioral and environmental interventions focusing on key behaviors of physical activity, healthy food choices, cigarette smoking, and alcohol consumption, as well as motivational readiness for change. Twenty worksites were randomized separately for each intervention using a two-by-two factorial design. All participants underwent a health risk appraisal and measurements were made at baseline and at 1 and 2 years.
RESULTS: The overall response rate for the baseline survey was 73% with 61% attending the health risk appraisal. The sample was predominantly male, English-speaking, married, blue-collar workers. Overall, 12% reported unsafe alcohol consumption, 26% were current smokers, 44% were physically inactive, 74% ate at most one piece of fruit per day, and 26% ate at most one serving of vegetables per day. Intervention and control conditions were similar at baseline for the primary outcomes, except that a higher proportion of the sociobehavioral intervention condition was more physically active (59%) than the corresponding control condition (53%).
CONCLUSIONS: This study will permit the rigorous evaluation of the efficacy of sociobehavioral and environ mental intervention approaches to workplace health promotion. Although participants were randomized by worksite, intervention and control conditions were similar at baseline; any differences in the primary out come variables will be controlled for in the analysis. Copyright 2000 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10964639     DOI: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  7 in total

1.  Who comes to a workplace health risk assessment?

Authors:  T A Dobbins; J M Simpson; B Oldenburg; N Owen; D Harris
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  1998

2.  A cluster-randomised, controlled trial to assess the impact of a workplace osteoporosis prevention intervention on the dietary and physical activity behaviours of working women: study protocol.

Authors:  Ai May Tan; Anthony D Lamontagne; Rani Sarmugam; Peter Howard
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Preventing chronic disease and improving health: broadening the scope of behavioral medicine research and practice.

Authors:  Brian Oldenburg
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2002

4.  Strategies to improve the implementation of workplace-based policies or practices targeting tobacco, alcohol, diet, physical activity and obesity.

Authors:  Luke Wolfenden; Sharni Goldman; Fiona G Stacey; Alice Grady; Melanie Kingsland; Christopher M Williams; John Wiggers; Andrew Milat; Chris Rissel; Adrian Bauman; Margaret M Farrell; France Légaré; Ali Ben Charif; Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun; Rebecca K Hodder; Jannah Jones; Debbie Booth; Benjamin Parmenter; Tim Regan; Sze Lin Yoong
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-11-14

5.  Fit for purpose? OrganisationaL prOdUctivity and woRkforce wellbeIng in workSpaces in Hospital (FLOURISH): a multimethod qualitative study protocol.

Authors:  Frances Rapport; Emilie Auton; John Cartmill; Jeffrey Braithwaite; Patti Shih; Anne Hogden; Robyn Clay-Williams
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-20       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  A mobile methods pilot study of surgical spaces: 'fit for purpose? Organisational productivity and workforce wellbeing in workspaces in hospital' (FLOURISH).

Authors:  Frances Rapport; Emilie Francis-Auton; John Cartmill; Tayhla Ryder; Jeffrey Braithwaite; Robyn Clay-Williams
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  The role of business size in assessing the uptake of health promoting workplace initiatives in Australia.

Authors:  A W Taylor; R Pilkington; A Montgomerie; H Feist
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.