S Malik1. 1. Higher Professional Training Fellow, Tayside Centre for General Practice, Kirsty Semple Way, Dundee DD2 4AD, Scotland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Medical students suffer from stress and psychological morbidity. Much of this stress is related to uncertainty about course work and workload. Although several student support systems are on offer at various medical schools, few have been shown to meet the needs of students. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate one student support scheme and determine the factors which are essential for success. METHOD: A total of 144 second- and third-year medical students were randomly selected at the University of Dundee. They were asked to complete questionnaires regarding contact with their personal tutors, frequency of meetings, activities during meetings, opinions on how to improve the system and how satisfied they were with the present system. In addition 28 tutors were also asked to complete a questionnaire which matched as far as possible that for students. Qualitative data was collected from semi-structured interviews, free-text responses from questionnaires, email communications with student group representatives and telephone interviews. RESULTS: The scheme was rated as successful or very successful by 25 (18.4%) students and five (29.4%) tutors. A high success rating was associated with regular and frequent meetings, with tutors actively seeking their students and taking part in social as well as academic activities. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship that is formed between students and tutors is the most important factor contributing to the success of the scheme. Taking part in social activities encourages the relationship to develop, whilst addressing academic problems helps to meet the needs of students. Those students who fail exams appear to have the same needs as those who pass.
BACKGROUND: Medical students suffer from stress and psychological morbidity. Much of this stress is related to uncertainty about course work and workload. Although several student support systems are on offer at various medical schools, few have been shown to meet the needs of students. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate one student support scheme and determine the factors which are essential for success. METHOD: A total of 144 second- and third-year medical students were randomly selected at the University of Dundee. They were asked to complete questionnaires regarding contact with their personal tutors, frequency of meetings, activities during meetings, opinions on how to improve the system and how satisfied they were with the present system. In addition 28 tutors were also asked to complete a questionnaire which matched as far as possible that for students. Qualitative data was collected from semi-structured interviews, free-text responses from questionnaires, email communications with student group representatives and telephone interviews. RESULTS: The scheme was rated as successful or very successful by 25 (18.4%) students and five (29.4%) tutors. A high success rating was associated with regular and frequent meetings, with tutors actively seeking their students and taking part in social as well as academic activities. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship that is formed between students and tutors is the most important factor contributing to the success of the scheme. Taking part in social activities encourages the relationship to develop, whilst addressing academic problems helps to meet the needs of students. Those students who fail exams appear to have the same needs as those who pass.