Literature DB >> 10964208

The influence of assessments on students' motivation to learn in a therapy degree course.

J K Seale1, J Chapman, C Davey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This paper reports a study which attempted to examine the influence of a varied assessment programme on student motivation to learn in an undergraduate therapy degree course.
METHODS: In March 1997 a questionnaire was distributed to 98 third-year occupational therapy and physiotherapy students at the Southampton University School of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy. Using closed and open questions the questionnaire required the students to consider all the assessments they had taken in their 3 years of study and provide information about which type of assessment they found most motivating for their learning, and why. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: The results revealed that students found a wide range of assessments motivating. There was some satisfaction with the mix and range of assessments. Three assessments emerged as the most motivating for student learning: Clinical/fieldwork II and III and Methods of inquiry III. In addition, four factors associated with assessment appeared to influence student motivation: perceived relevance and content of the assessment, enthusiastic lecturers and group influences. These factors need to be explored in more detail but in order to do so, educators need to be prepared to engage in an open dialogue with students about the learning climate that is created within higher education.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10964208     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00528.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  8 in total

1.  Can formative quizzes predict or improve summative exam performance?

Authors:  Niu Zhang; Charles N R Henderson
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2014-12-17

2.  Limitations of student-driven formative assessment in a clinical clerkship. A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Edward J Palmer; Peter G Devitt
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2008-05-11       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Assessment for learning with Objectively Structured Practical Examination in Biochemistry.

Authors:  Shivani Jaswal; Jugesh Chattwal; Jasbinder Kaur; Seema Gupta; Tejinder Singh
Journal:  Int J Appl Basic Med Res       Date:  2015-08

4.  The assessment of a structured online formative assessment program: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Edward Palmer; Peter Devitt
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Educational outcomes of a new curriculum on interproximal oral prophylaxis for dental students.

Authors:  Denis Bourgeois; Ina Saliasi; Claude Dussart; Juan Carlos Llodra; Delphine Tardivo; Laurent Laforest; Manuel Bravo; Stéphane Viennot; Bruno Foti; Florence Carrouel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Students' perceptions of teaching factors that demotivate their learning in lectures and laboratory-based skills practice.

Authors:  Miyuki Takase; Mayumi Niitani; Takiko Imai; Mari Okada
Journal:  Int J Nurs Sci       Date:  2019-08-17

7.  Validating the effectiveness of Clinically Oriented Physiology Teaching (COPT) in undergraduate physiology curriculum.

Authors:  Reem Abraham; Komattil Ramnarayan; Asha Kamath
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Online formative assessments: exploring their educational value.

Authors:  Kavitha Nagandla; Sharifah Sulaiha; Sivalingam Nalliah
Journal:  J Adv Med Educ Prof       Date:  2018-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.