| Literature DB >> 10963859 |
Abstract
It happened exactly 100 years ago that Warren established for the first time a quantitative link between dose and time while studying the toxicity of sodium chloride in Daphnia magna (Straus). During this century many toxicologists in different contexts returned to this idea, which has become known as Haber's rule of inhalation toxicology. Most attempts to explore this relationship ended in frustration because of the supposed occurrence of exceptions. Thus, toxicologists concentrated on the quantitative relationship between dose and effect under mostly isotemporal conditions while time took a back seat and was assigned such arbitrary, semiquantitative designations as acute, subacute, subchronic and chronic. Time itself as a quantifiable variable of toxicity was seldom studied and when it was studied, it was often not under isodosic (steady state) conditions as required by theory. A recent analysis of toxicological time indicated the impact of three independent time scales (toxicokinetic, toxicodynamic, exposure frequency/duration) in toxicological studies, which interact with dose and effect to yield the enormous complexity known to every toxicologist. Based on prototypical examples when toxicokinetic (dioxins), toxicodynamic (nitrosamines, benzene) or exposure frequency (methylene chloride, chloroacetic acid, HgCl(2), CdCl(2), etc.) represent the critical time scale, the general validity of the c x t=k concept will be discussed as a starting point for a theory of toxicology. As endpoints of toxicity, (delayed) acute toxicity, blood dyscrasias and cancer will be used to illustrate the critical conditions needed to demonstrate the validity of this theory.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2000 PMID: 10963859 DOI: 10.1016/s0300-483x(00)00230-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicology ISSN: 0300-483X Impact factor: 4.221