Literature DB >> 10963857

The use of Haber's law in standard setting and risk assessment.

D W Gaylor1.   

Abstract

Haber's Law simply states that the incidence and/or severity of a toxic effect depends on the total exposure, i.e. exposure concentration (c) rate times the duration time (t) of exposure (c x t). This rule, within constraints, is often used in setting exposure guidelines for toxic substances. Establishing reference doses (acceptable daily intakes) for long-term exposures when only the results of short-term studies are available requires the use of an uncertainty (safety) factor. The value of this uncertainty factor often approximates a value comparable to Haber's Law for extrapolation from short-term to long-term exposure durations. As a default procedure, cancer risk estimates are generally based on the average lifetime daily dose which is derived from the total cumulative exposure, i.e. Haber's (c x t). This has been shown both theoretically and empirically to be valid within a factor of 20 for carcinogenesis. This provides some credence for the use of an additional safety factor of 10, in some instances, for exposures of children to carcinogens. Finally, a generalization of Haber's Law, exposure concentration raised to a power times exposure duration, is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10963857     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-483x(00)00228-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicology        ISSN: 0300-483X            Impact factor:   4.221


  7 in total

1.  Developmental toxicity of low generation PAMAM dendrimers in zebrafish.

Authors:  Tisha C King Heiden; Emelyne Dengler; Weiyuan John Kao; Warren Heideman; Richard E Peterson
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 4.219

2.  Toxicity of lunar dust assessed in inhalation-exposed rats.

Authors:  Chiu-wing Lam; Robert R Scully; Ye Zhang; Roger A Renne; Robert L Hunter; Richard A McCluskey; Bean T Chen; Vincent Castranova; Kevin E Driscoll; Donald E Gardner; Roger O McClellan; Bonnie L Cooper; David S McKay; Linda Marshall; John T James
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.724

3.  Analysis of the influence of cell heterogeneity on nanoparticle dose response.

Authors:  Matthew J Ware; Biana Godin; Neenu Singh; Ravish Majithia; Sabeel Shamsudeen; Rita E Serda; Kenith E Meissner; Paul Rees; Huw D Summers
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 15.881

4.  Comparison of biological responses in rats under various cigarette smoke exposure conditions.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tsuji; Hitoshi Fujimoto; Daiki Matsuura; Tomoki Nishino; K Monica Lee; Hiroyuki Yoshimura
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 1.628

5.  Interaction of exposure concentration and duration in determining the apoptosis of testis in rats after cigarette smoke inhalation.

Authors:  Lijuan He; Haiyan Gong; Jing Zhang; Chunxue Zhong; Yunfei Huang; Chen Zhang; Muhammad Aqeel Ashraf
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Widespread Natural Occurrence of Hydroxyurea in Animals.

Authors:  David I Fraser; Kyle T Liu; Bryan J Reid; Emily Hawkins; Andrew Sevier; Michelle Pyle; Jacob W Robinson; Pierre H R Ouellette; James S Ballantyne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Extrapolating from acute to chronic toxicity in vitro.

Authors:  Peter Macko; Taina Palosaari; Maurice Whelan
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 3.500

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.