Literature DB >> 10963818

Reliability of digital videometry and acetate tracing in measuring the surface area of cutaneous wounds.

R P Wunderlich1, E J Peters, D G Armstrong, L A Lavery.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of digital videometry and acetate tracing in the measurement of cutaneous wound area.
METHODS: Four clinicians used both digital videometry and acetate tracing to measure five wounds that were artificially created on a cadaver specimen. In addition, the clinicians used an analog centimeter ruler to determine a rough estimate of the area of each wound. The wounds were measured a total of five times with each measurement instrument using a non-sequential repeat measures design. Associations between the three wound measurement techniques were examined with Pearson correlation coefficients. In addition, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for each pair of the three measurement techniques.
RESULTS: Correlation between the measurement systems for all raters combined yielded Pearson r-values of 0.93 for ruler and acetate, 0.95 for ruler and digital and 0.97 for acetate and digital. Furthermore, the average measure ICC between acetate and digital was 0.94, between acetate and ruler was 0.76 and between digital and ruler was 0.57.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that wound area measurements obtained using digital videometry and acetate tracing are very similar and both techniques can be used interchangeably in either clinical or research settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10963818     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8227(00)00145-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract        ISSN: 0168-8227            Impact factor:   5.602


  6 in total

1.  Digital planimetry results in more accurate wound measurements: a comparison to standard ruler measurements.

Authors:  Lee C Rogers; Nicholas J Bevilacqua; David G Armstrong; George Andros
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-07-01

Review 2.  Methods to assess area and volume of wounds - a systematic review.

Authors:  Line Bisgaard Jørgensen; Jens A Sørensen; Gregor Be Jemec; Knud B Yderstraede
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Hyperspectral imaging in wound care: A systematic review.

Authors:  Gennadi Saiko; Phoebe Lombardi; Yunghan Au; Douglas Queen; David Armstrong; Keith Harding
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  An Automatic Assessment System of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Based on Wound Area Determination, Color Segmentation, and Healing Score Evaluation.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Peder C Pedersen; Diane M Strong; Bengisu Tulu; Emmanuel Agu; Ron Ignotz; Qian He
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-08-07

5.  UK Dermatology Clinical Trials Network's STOP GAP trial (a multicentre trial of prednisolone versus ciclosporin for pyoderma gangrenosum): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Fiona F Craig; Kim S Thomas; Eleanor J Mitchell; Hywel C Williams; John Norrie; James M Mason; Anthony D Ormerod
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Wound Area Measurement with Digital Planimetry: Improved Accuracy and Precision with Calibration Based on 2 Rulers.

Authors:  Piotr Foltynski; Piotr Ladyzynski; Anna Ciechanowska; Karolina Migalska-Musial; Grzegorz Judzewicz; Stanislawa Sabalinska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.