Literature DB >> 10963527

Blunt splenic injury in adults: Multi-institutional Study of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

A B Peitzman1, B Heil, L Rivera, M B Federle, B G Harbrecht, K D Clancy, M Croce, B L Enderson, J A Morris, D Shatz, J W Meredith, J B Ochoa, S M Fakhry, J G Cushman, J P Minei, M McCarthy, F A Luchette, R Townsend, G Tinkoff, E F Block, S Ross, E R Frykberg, R M Bell, F Davis, L Weireter, M B Shapiro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nonoperative management of blunt injury to the spleen in adults has been applied with increasing frequency. However, the criteria for nonoperative management are controversial. The purpose of this multi-institutional study was to determine which factors predict successful observation of blunt splenic injury in adults.
METHODS: A total of 1,488 adults (>15 years of age) with blunt splenic injury from 27 trauma centers in 1997 were studied through the Multi-institutional Trials Committee of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Statistical analysis was performed with analysis of variance and extended chi2 test. Data are expressed as mean +/- SD; a value of p < 0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: A total of 38.5 % of patients went directly to the operating room (group I); 61.5% of patients were admitted with planned nonoperative management. Of the patients admitted with planned observation, 10.8% failed and required laparotomy; 82.1% of patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) < 15 and 46.6% of patients with ISS > 15 were successfully observed. Frequency of immediate operation correlated with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grades of splenic injury: I (23.9%), II (22.4%), III (38.1%), IV (73.7%), and V (94.9%) (p < 0.05). Of patients initially managed nonoperatively, the failure rate increased significantly by AAST grade of splenic injury: I (4.8%), II (9.5%), III (19.6%), IV (33.3%), and V (75.0%) (p < 0.05). A total of 60.9% of the patients failed nonoperative management within 24 hours of admission; 8% failed 9 days or later after injury. Laparotomy was ultimately performed in 19.9% of patients with small hemoperitoneum, 49.4% of patients with moderate hemoperitoneum, and 72.6% of patients with large hemoperitoneum.
CONCLUSION: In this multicenter study, 38.5% of adults with blunt splenic injury went directly to laparotomy. Ultimately, 54.8% of patients were successfully managed nonoperatively; the failure rate of planned observation was 10.8%, with 60.9% of failures occurring in the first 24 hours. Successful nonoperative management was associated with higher blood pressure and hematocrit, and less severe injury based on ISS, Glasgow Coma Scale, grade of splenic injury, and quantity of hemoperitoneum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10963527     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200008000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  85 in total

1.  Evaluation of need for operative intervention in blunt splenic injury: intraperitoneal contrast extravasation has an increased probability of requiring operative intervention.

Authors:  Chih-Yuan Fu; Shih-Chi Wu; Ray-Jade Chen; Yung-Fang Chen; Yu-Chun Wang; Hung-Chang Huang; Jui-Chien Huang; Chih-Wei Lu; Wei-Ching Lin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Gastrointestinal tract perforation following blunt abdominal trauma: an institution's experience.

Authors:  K-K Tan; J Z-Y Liu; A Vijayan; M-T Chiu
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Intraparenchymal Doppler ultrasound after proximal embolization of the splenic artery in trauma patients.

Authors:  Johann B Dormagen; Christine Gaarder; Leiv Sandvik; Pål A Naess; Nils E Kløw
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Splenic rupture as a complication of colonoscopy: report of a case.

Authors:  Aravind Pothula; Joshua Lampert; Haggi Mazeh; David Eisenberg; Han-Yu Shen
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Management of blunt splenic injury in a UK major trauma centre and predicting the failure of non-operative management: a retrospective, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Stella R Smith; Louise Morris; Stephen Spreadborough; Waleed Al-Obaydi; Marta D'Auria; Hilary White; Adam J Brooks
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Splenic laceration after routine colonoscopy, a case report of a rare iatrogenic complication.

Authors:  Shuo Li; Nishant Gupta; Yogesh Kumar; Frank Mele
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-05-16

7.  Splenic trauma in the twenty-first century: changing trends in management.

Authors:  P Roy; R Mukherjee; M Parik
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Early Surgery in Prone Position for Associated Injuries in Patients Undergoing Non-operative Management for Splenic and Liver Injuries.

Authors:  Kathrin Markert; Tobias Haltmeier; Tatsiana Khatsilouskaya; Marius J Keel; Daniel Candinas; Beat Schnüriger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Thromboembolic Prophylaxis with Heparin in Patients with Blunt Solid Organ Injuries Undergoing Non-operative Treatment.

Authors:  Tatsiana Khatsilouskaya; Tobias Haltmeier; Marionna Cathomas; Barbara Eberle; Daniel Candinas; Beat Schnüriger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Imaging and transcatheter arterial embolization for traumatic splenic injuries: review of the literature.

Authors:  Antony Raikhlin; Mark Otto Baerlocher; Murray R Asch; Andy Myers
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.