Literature DB >> 10963159

Antegrade or retrograde reamed femoral nailing. A prospective, randomised trial.

P Tornetta1, D Tiburzi.   

Abstract

Retrograde femoral nailing is gaining in popularity. We report a prospective, randomised comparison of antegrade and retrograde procedures in 68 patients with 69 fractures of the femoral shaft. All nails were inserted after appropriate reaming. There was no difference in operating time, blood loss, technical complications, size of nail or reamer, or transfusion requirements. There were more problems of length and rotation using a retrograde technique on a radiolucent table than with an antegrade approach on a fracture table. All fractures in both groups healed and there was no difference in the time taken to achieve union. Although retrograde nailing is a promising technique the skills required need practice. A longer period of follow-up is necessary to determine whether there are long-term problems in the knee after such surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10963159     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b5.10038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  29 in total

1.  [Fracture of the medial femoral condyle as a complication of retrograde femoral nail removal].

Authors:  K Grimme; T Gosling; H C Pape; P Schandelmaier; C Krettek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [Clinical results with A new retrograde femoral nail with a radiographical-free proximal locking device. A prospective study with 50 fractures].

Authors:  B Friemert; P Keppler; F von Lübken; C Willy; L Claes; H Gerngross; D Wörz
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Anatomy of the greater trochanteric 'bald spot': a potential portal for abductor sparing femoral nailing?

Authors:  Michael J Gardner; William J Robertson; Sreevathsa Boraiah; Joseph U Barker; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Femur fractures in professional athletes: a case series.

Authors:  Robby Sikka; Gary Fetzer; Thomas Hunkele; Eric Sugarman; Joel Boyd
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Healing, nonunion, and re-operation after internal fixation of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Riikka E Koso; Cristina Terhoeve; R Grant Steen; Robert Zura
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Risk of septic knee following retrograde intramedullary nailing of open and closed femur fractures.

Authors:  Jason J Halvorson; Marc Barnett; Ben Jackson; John P Birkedal
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Bisphosphonate-induced atypical subtrochanteric femoral fracture.

Authors:  Raju Vaishya; Abhishek Vaish; Arshad Nadeem
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-11-28

Review 8.  Variability in the assessment of fracture-healing in orthopaedic trauma studies.

Authors:  Luis A Corrales; Saam Morshed; Mohit Bhandari; Theodore Miclau
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  [Post-traumatic torsional differences and functional tests following antegrade or retrograde intramedullary nailing of the distal femoral diaphysis].

Authors:  D G Maier; R Reisig; P Keppler; L Kinzl; F Gebhard
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 10.  [Fractures of the shaft of the femur].

Authors:  T Lögters; J Windolf; S Flohé
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.