BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The evaluation of the appropriateness of hospital admissions and hospital stays has become an increasingly important issue in Germany. Evaluations by the German Physicians Review Organizations (MDS, MDK) demonstrated the need for a standardized, valid and reliable assessment tool for inappropriate hospital use. Objective of this study was to test the reliability of a German adaptation of the "Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol" (AEP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From the 2317 admissions to medical wards of a teaching hospital in Hessia in 1997 we randomly selected 52 patients to test the inter-rater-reliability (54% female, mean age = 66 years +/- 18). Another 49 patients were randomly selected to test the intra-rater-reliability of the AEP (53% female, mean age = 61 years +/- 20). We estimated general agreement, specific agreement and Kappa statistics for the agreement of the evaluation of hospital admissions and hospital days. 95% confidence intervals were reported. RESULTS: The German adaptation of the AEP showed an inter-rater-agreement of 92% (88-96%) for hospital admissions and 76% (73-80%) for hospital days. Correspondingly, we observed an intra-rater-agreement of 96% (88-100%) for hospital admissions and 93% (91-95%) for hospital days. The high agreement was independent of the length of hospital stay and independent of the proportion of inappropriate hospital days. CONCLUSION: A standard instrument for the assessment of the appropriateness of hospital care with known metric properties may be useful for quality management in hospitals and provide competitive advantages in a consolidating health care market. The AEP could be such an instrument.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The evaluation of the appropriateness of hospital admissions and hospital stays has become an increasingly important issue in Germany. Evaluations by the German Physicians Review Organizations (MDS, MDK) demonstrated the need for a standardized, valid and reliable assessment tool for inappropriate hospital use. Objective of this study was to test the reliability of a German adaptation of the "Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol" (AEP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From the 2317 admissions to medical wards of a teaching hospital in Hessia in 1997 we randomly selected 52 patients to test the inter-rater-reliability (54% female, mean age = 66 years +/- 18). Another 49 patients were randomly selected to test the intra-rater-reliability of the AEP (53% female, mean age = 61 years +/- 20). We estimated general agreement, specific agreement and Kappa statistics for the agreement of the evaluation of hospital admissions and hospital days. 95% confidence intervals were reported. RESULTS: The German adaptation of the AEP showed an inter-rater-agreement of 92% (88-96%) for hospital admissions and 76% (73-80%) for hospital days. Correspondingly, we observed an intra-rater-agreement of 96% (88-100%) for hospital admissions and 93% (91-95%) for hospital days. The high agreement was independent of the length of hospital stay and independent of the proportion of inappropriate hospital days. CONCLUSION: A standard instrument for the assessment of the appropriateness of hospital care with known metric properties may be useful for quality management in hospitals and provide competitive advantages in a consolidating health care market. The AEP could be such an instrument.