Literature DB >> 10962498

Does caloric restriction induce hormesis?

A Turturro1, B S Hass, R W Hart.   

Abstract

The question of whether caloric restriction (CR) is hormetic is addressed in terms of two common definitions of the term. In terms of the older definition, i.e., a growth-stimulatory effect when lower doses of a compound which resulted in growth inhibition at higher doses, CR is better characterized as a co-hormetic (i.e., a paradigm which at relatively "low doses," in combination with some stimulus, will evince increased growth (proliferation) and at higher "doses" will inhibit this increased proliferation) rather than a hormetic agent. Mechanisms such as cellular selection of cellular subpopulations, increases in receptor efficiency, and preservation of cellular proliferative potential can interact with agents and produce increased growth as long as the CR is not too severe. In terms of a broader definition, i.e., nonmonotonic dose-response behavior of a compound for any adverse response, CR appears to be hormetic, both as a result of body weight (BW) loss and other potential mechanisms. The impact of changes in BW, or frank CR, can be considered a component of every test for hormesis, and is thus capable for interaction with any other agent. The changes that BW loss (or CR) induce are so profound that any aspect of an agent's action - metabolism, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics - can modulate the response of an organism to an agent. Similarly, other effects of a chemical that induce BW loss, e.g., physical activity or temperature dysregulation, can also induce dose-response curves that appear hormetic. The interaction of the hormetic agents of BW loss and CR can influence agent tests. Controlling these factors may make it possible to dissect the key components of a hormetic response. In addition, the effects of CR or BW loss appear to extrapolate well across species [Colman R, Kemnitz JW. Aging experiments using nonhuman primates. In: Yu BP (Ed), Methods in Aging Research. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1999, pp. 249-267]. Thus there is some reason to believe that these hormetic factors may be important for humans, and may already be a factor for tests of potentially adverse agents already conducted in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10962498     DOI: 10.1191/096032700678815981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol        ISSN: 0960-3271            Impact factor:   2.903


  8 in total

1.  Does Bertrand's rule apply to macronutrients?

Authors:  D Raubenheimer; K P Lee; S J Simpson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  FoxOs: Unifying links between oxidative stress and skeletal homeostasis.

Authors:  Stavroula Kousteni
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Mimetics of hormetic agents: stress-resistance triggers.

Authors:  Joan Smith Sonneborn
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Effects of aging and caloric restriction on dentate gyrus synapses and glutamate receptor subunits.

Authors:  Isabel G Newton; M Elizabeth Forbes; M Constance Linville; Hui Pang; Elizabeth W Tucker; David R Riddle; Judy K Brunso-Bechtold
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 5.  Hormesis and medicine.

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Congenital DNA repair deficiency results in protection against renal ischemia reperfusion injury in mice.

Authors:  Denis Susa; James R Mitchell; Marielle Verweij; Marieke van de Ven; Henk Roest; Sandra van den Engel; Ingeborg Bajema; Kirsten Mangundap; Jan N M Ijzermans; Jan H J Hoeijmakers; Ron W F de Bruin
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 9.304

7.  A signature of renal stress resistance induced by short-term dietary restriction, fasting, and protein restriction.

Authors:  F Jongbloed; T C Saat; M Verweij; C Payan-Gomez; J H J Hoeijmakers; S van den Engel; C T van Oostrom; G Ambagtsheer; S Imholz; J L A Pennings; H van Steeg; J N M IJzermans; M E T Dollé; R W F de Bruin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Increased survival of honeybees in the laboratory after simultaneous exposure to low doses of pesticides and bacteria.

Authors:  Franziska Dickel; Daniel Münch; Gro Vang Amdam; Johanna Mappes; Dalial Freitak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.