Literature DB >> 10962345

Exercise-induced bone gain is due to enlargement in bone size without a change in volumetric bone density: a peripheral quantitative computed tomography study of the upper arms of male tennis players.

H Haapasalo1, S Kontulainen, H Sievänen, P Kannus, M Järvinen, I Vuori.   

Abstract

Bilateral bone characteristics of the humerus (proximal, shaft, and distal sites) and radius (shaft and distal sites) in 12 former Finnish national-level male tennis players (mean age 30 years) and their 12 age-, height-, and weight-matched controls were measured with peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT). The pQCT variables analyzed were bone mineral content (BMC), total cross-sectional area of bone (Tot.Ar), cross-sectional area of the marrow cavity (M.Cav.Ar), cortical bone (Co.Ar) and trabecular bone (Tr.Ar), volumetric density of cortical (Co.Dn) and trabecular (Tr. Dn) bone, cortical wall thickness (Co.Wi.Th), bone strength index (BSI), and principal moments of inertia (I(min) and I(max)). In the players, significant side-to-side differences, in favor of the dominant (playing) arm, were found in BMC (ranging 14%-27%), Tot.Ar (16%-21%), Co.Ar (12%-32%), BSI (23%-37%), I(min) (33%-61%), and I(max) (27%-67%) at all measured bone sites, and in Co.Wi.Th. (5%-25%) at the humeral and radial shafts, and distal humerus. The side-to-side M.Cav.Ar difference was significant at the proximal humerus (19%) and radial shaft (29%). Concerning the players' Co.Dn and Tr.Dn, the only significant side-to-side difference was found in the Co.Dn of the distal humerus, with the playing arm showing a slightly smaller Co.Dn than the nonplaying arm (-2%). In controls, significant dominant-to-nondominant side differences were also found, but with the majority of the differences being rather small, and significantly lower than those of the players. In conclusion, despite the large side-to-side differences in BMC, the volumetric bone density (Co.Dn, Tr.Dn) was almost identical in the dominant and nondominant arms of the players and controls. Thus, the players' high playing-arm BMC was due to increases in the Tot.Ar, M.Cav.Ar, Co.Ar, and CW.Th. In other words, the playing arm's extra bone mineral, and thus increased bone strength, was mainly due to increased bone size and not due to a change in volumetric bone density. These upper arm results may not be generalized to the entire skeleton, but the finding may give new insight into conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-based bone density measurements when interpreting the effects of exercise on bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10962345     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(00)00331-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  115 in total

1.  Biomechanics or necromechanics? Or how to interpret biomechanical studies.

Authors:  Richard A Brand
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2002

Review 2.  Regulation of skeletal remodeling by biomechanical input.

Authors:  Janet Rubin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Nerve conduction studies of upper extremities in tennis players.

Authors:  T Colak; B Bamaç; A Ozbek; F Budak; Y S Bamaç
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  Bone geometry and strength adaptations to physical constraints inherent in different sports: comparison between elite female soccer players and swimmers.

Authors:  Beatrice Ferry; Martine Duclos; Lauren Burt; Perrine Therre; Franck Le Gall; Christelle Jaffré; Daniel Courteix
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Focal enhancement of the skeleton to exercise correlates with responsivity of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells rather than peak external forces.

Authors:  Ian J Wallace; Gabriel M Pagnotti; Jasper Rubin-Sigler; Matthew Naeher; Lynn E Copes; Stefan Judex; Clinton T Rubin; Brigitte Demes
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Diet and exercise during growth have site-specific skeletal effects: a co-twin control study.

Authors:  Sandra Iuliano-Burns; Jennifer Stone; John L Hopper; Ego Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Bone status in elite male runners.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kemmler; Klaus Engelke; Heiko Baumann; Carola Beeskow; Simon von Stengel; Jürgen Weineck; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Controlled longitudinal study of bone mass accrual in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  H M Buntain; P J Schluter; S C Bell; R M Greer; J C H Wong; J Batch; P Lewindon; C E Wainwright
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2005-12-29       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 9.  Muscle and bone plasticity after spinal cord injury: review of adaptations to disuse and to electrical muscle stimulation.

Authors:  Shauna Dudley-Javoroski; Richard K Shields
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

10.  Time-course of exercise and its association with 12-month bone changes.

Authors:  Riikka Ahola; Raija Korpelainen; Aki Vainionpää; Juhani Leppäluoto; Timo Jämsä
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.