Literature DB >> 10961745

Safety and success of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

O Avrutis1, S J Friedman, J Meshoulm, L Haskel, S Adler.   

Abstract

Although elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy is today's gold standard for the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis, its safety and effectiveness for acute cholecystitis remain controversial. The authors present a retrospective study comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the acute versus the elective setting. A total of 605 patients were treated surgically for gallstone disease between August 1991 and January 1999. A total of 269 patients (44.5%) underwent surgery for acute cholecystitis as soon as possible after diagnosis, and elective cholecystectomy was performed on 336 patients (55.5%) for symptomatic gallstones. Initial open cholecystectomy was performed on 52 (19.3%) of the acute patients and 16 (4.8%) of the elective patients. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was attempted on 217 of the acute patients (80.7%), with 11 cases (5.1%) converted to open cholecystectomy, and on 320 (95.2%) of the elective patients, with 6 cases (1.9%) converted to open cholecystectomy. The mean (+/-SD) operative time for the acute and elective patients was 105 (+/-38) and 85 (+/-21) minutes, respectively (P < 0.05). There was no perioperative mortality in either laparoscopic group. Surgical complications related to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the acute and elective groups occurred in six (2.9%) and eight (2.5%) cases, respectively (P = NS). The current study shows that early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is safe and efficient. Low conversion rates can be maintained with strict guidelines for appropriate patient selection, adequate experience, and proper laparoscopic technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10961745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  5 in total

1.  Laparoscopic management of intra-abdominal infections: Systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Federico Coccolini; Cristian Tranà; Massimo Sartelli; Fausto Catena; Salomone Di Saverio; Roberto Manfredi; Giulia Montori; Marco Ceresoli; Chiara Falcone; Luca Ansaloni
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-08-27

Review 2.  Laparoscopy for abdominal emergencies: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  S Sauerland; F Agresta; R Bergamaschi; G Borzellino; A Budzynski; G Champault; A Fingerhut; A Isla; M Johansson; P Lundorff; B Navez; S Saad; E A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 3.  Early versus delayed-interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a metaanalysis.

Authors:  H Lau; C Y Lo; N G Patil; W K Yuen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 3.453

4.  Comparison of Visceral Fat Accumulation and Metabolome Markers among Cats of Varying BCS and Novel Classification of Feline Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome.

Authors:  Yuki Okada; Motoo Kobayashi; Masaki Sawamura; Toshiro Arai
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-02-14

5.  Comparison of oxidative stress status in dogs undergoing laparoscopic and open ovariectomy.

Authors:  Jae Yeon Lee; Myung Cheol Kim
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 1.267

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.