Literature DB >> 10961050

Contribution to the biological assessment of orthodontic acrylic materials. Measurement of their residual monomer output and cytotoxicity.

E C Rose1, J Bumann, I E Jonas, H F Kappert.   

Abstract

The acrylic materials used in orthodontics for the fabrication of removable appliances are subjected in the oral cavity to processes of change which influence their physical, mechanical and biological properties. It is therefore essential that every newly developed material must be judged in terms of its clinical value. In the present study, 2 orthodontic cold-cure acrylics, Orthocryl and Forestacryl, and 4 orthodontic photocure acrylics, Triad, Wil-O-Dont, Odontolux and Lux-A-Tech, were investigated and compared with 2 prosthetic acrylic materials: the cold-cure acrylic Palapress and the hot-cure acrylic Paladon. The quantity of residual monomers from methyl methacrylate (MAA) or urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) eluted from the sample in a given time after the processing was estimated by high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). The cytotoxic properties of the materials were examined by Mosmann's proliferation-inhibition test with an established culture of fibroblasts (= MTT test). The hot-cure acrylic Paladon produced by far the smallest amount of eluted residual monomer and the least growth inhibition in the MTT test. The prosthetic cold-cure acrylic Palapress achieved significantly better results than the orthodontic cold-cure materials Orthocryl and Forestacryl. The photocure acrylics released less UDMA than did the cold-cure acrylics MMA. In the cell culture test, all the orthodontic materials examined were assessed as "slightly cytotoxic"; the prosthetic acrylics were graded under ISO-standard 10993-5 as "noncytotoxic". After soaking the plastic material in water for 3 days its cytotoxic properties, as exemplified by the cold-cure acrylic Forestacryl and the photocure acrylic Triad, were reduced, and during the following investigation no more inhibition of growth was observed. It was possible to confirm with the tests used that, for Triad, it is necessary to carefully remove the oxygen-inhibition layer of the photocure acrylic in order to improve the biological properties. The influence of the plastic material on fibroblast cultures was assessed, among other methods, by the quantity of residual monomers liberated. These were significantly reduced after soaking the manufactured substance in water for 3 days. Careful laboratory treatment of the photocure acrylics is necessary in order to improve their biological properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10961050     DOI: 10.1007/s000560050010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  5 in total

1.  Influence of polymerization method on the cytotoxicity of three different denture base acrylic resins polymerized in different methods.

Authors:  Zbigniew Raszewski
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.219

2.  Osteoblast response to polymethyl methacrylate bioactive glass composite.

Authors:  M Hautamäki; V V Meretoja; R H Mattila; A J Aho; P K Vallittu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Level of residual monomer released from orthodontic acrylic materials.

Authors:  R Betul Iça; Fırat Öztürk; Burhan Ates; Meral Arslan Malkoc; Ünzile Kelestemur
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  In vitro cytotoxicity of self-curing acrylic resins of different colors.

Authors:  Luciana Borges Retamoso; Taís de Morais Alves da Cunha; Matheus Melo Pithon; Rogério Lacerda dos Santos; Fernanda Otaviano Martins; Maria Teresa Villela Romanos; Orlando Motohiro Tanaka
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug

5.  Influence of Test Specimen Geometry and Water Soaking on the In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Orthocryl®, Orthocryl® LC, Loctite® EA 9483 and Polypropylene.

Authors:  Richard Behnke; Franka Stahl; Kathrin Duske; Mareike Warkentin; Margit Schwartz; Burkhard Hinz; Udo Walther
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.927

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.