| Literature DB >> 10960848 |
Abstract
This paper considers the underlying principles of depicting disease incidence on geographical maps and uses them to attempt a comparative classification of methods. After a discussion of the possibilities for incorporating time, we consider projection methods, some of which have been used to portray information in a manner supposed to be independent of population density. We then distinguish between non-parametric and model-based methods, including models for areal data using Bayesian ideas. Data in point form are also discussed and it is argued that the relative risk function provides a fundamental model useful for assessing different methods as a whole, some of which are known to be flawed and many of which are untested as regards their statistical properties. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Mesh:
Year: 2000 PMID: 10960848 DOI: 10.1002/1097-0258(20000915/30)19:17/18<2203::aid-sim564>3.0.co;2-u
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stat Med ISSN: 0277-6715 Impact factor: 2.373