BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In dermatologic laser therapy, cryogen spray cooling (CSC) is a means to protect the epidermis while leaving dermal structures susceptible to thermal damage. The purpose of this study was to determine optimal spurt duration, tau(s), and optimal delay, tau(d), between the cryogen spurt and laser pulse when using CSC in treatment of port wine stain birthmarks. STUDY DESIGN/ MATERIALS AND METHODS: A finite difference method is used to compute temperature distributions in human skin in response to CSC. Optimal tau(s) and tau(d) are determined by maximizing the temperature difference between a modeled basal layer and an imaginary target chromophore. RESULTS: The model predicts an optimal tau(s) of 170-300 msec and approximately 400 msec for shallow (150 microm) and deeper (400 microm) targets, respectively. Spraying for longer than the optimal tau(s) does not critically impair cooling selectivity. For a spurt duration of 100 msec, optimal delays are 5-10 msec and 25-70 msec for a shallow and deep basal layer, respectively. CONCLUSION: In the absence of knowledge about the lesion anatomy, using a tau(s) of 100-200 msec and no delay is a good compromise. A delay is justified only when basal layer and target chromophore are relatively deep and the optimal spurt duration cannot be applied, e.g., to avoid frostbite. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In dermatologic laser therapy, cryogen spray cooling (CSC) is a means to protect the epidermis while leaving dermal structures susceptible to thermal damage. The purpose of this study was to determine optimal spurt duration, tau(s), and optimal delay, tau(d), between the cryogen spurt and laser pulse when using CSC in treatment of port wine stain birthmarks. STUDY DESIGN/ MATERIALS AND METHODS: A finite difference method is used to compute temperature distributions in human skin in response to CSC. Optimal tau(s) and tau(d) are determined by maximizing the temperature difference between a modeled basal layer and an imaginary target chromophore. RESULTS: The model predicts an optimal tau(s) of 170-300 msec and approximately 400 msec for shallow (150 microm) and deeper (400 microm) targets, respectively. Spraying for longer than the optimal tau(s) does not critically impair cooling selectivity. For a spurt duration of 100 msec, optimal delays are 5-10 msec and 25-70 msec for a shallow and deep basal layer, respectively. CONCLUSION: In the absence of knowledge about the lesion anatomy, using a tau(s) of 100-200 msec and no delay is a good compromise. A delay is justified only when basal layer and target chromophore are relatively deep and the optimal spurt duration cannot be applied, e.g., to avoid frostbite. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Edward C Kuan; Ashley A Hamamoto; Victor Sun; Tony Nguyen; Cyrus T Manuel; Dmitry E Protsenko; Brian J F Wong; J Stuart Nelson; Wangcun Jia Journal: Lasers Surg Med Date: 2014-11-18 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: Edward C Wu; Victor Sun; Cyrus T Manuel; Dmitriy E Protsenko; Wangcun Jia; J Stuart Nelson; Brian J F Wong Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2013-01-10 Impact factor: 3.161