Literature DB >> 10960525

Inactivation of WBCs in RBC suspensions by photoactive phenothiazine dyes: comparison of dimethylmethylene blue and MB.

A A Skripchenko1, S J Wagner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The transfusion of blood components containing WBCs can cause unwanted complications, which include virus transmission, transfusion-associated GVHD, alloimmunization, febrile reactions, and immunomodulation. Phototreatment with 4 microM of dimethylmethylene blue (DMMB) and 13 J per cm(2) of white light irradiation has previously been shown to be an effective way to inactivate different models of enveloped and nonenveloped viruses in RBC suspensions, with minimum damage to RBCs. The present study compares WBC photoinactivation in buffy coat after DMMB or MB phototreatment under virucidal conditions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Buffy coat diluted to 30-percent Hct was treated with the dye and white light. Isolated WBCs were assayed for cell proliferation and viability by an assay using a tetrazolium compound, limiting dilution analysis, DNA fragmentation, and flow cytometry assays.
RESULTS: DMMB and 2.5 J per cm(2) of light phototreatment can inactivate T cells to the limit of detection by limiting dilution analysis (>4.76 log reduction). No WBC proliferation activity was observed after DMMB and 3.8 J per cm(2) of light. DNA degradation after DMMB phototreatment was light dependent. In addition, DMMB phototreatment induced apoptosis in WBCs. In contrast, MB phototreatment under virucidal conditions did not cause significant changes in the viability of WBCs. Neither DNA degradation nor signs of apoptosis were observed after MB phototreatment.
CONCLUSION: DMMB phototreatment inactivates T-lymphocytes, the cells that cause GVHD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10960525     DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2000.40080968.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  5 in total

1.  Rationale and mechanism for the low photoinactivation rate of bacteria in plasma.

Authors:  Jie Chen; Thomas C Cesario; Peter M Rentzepis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Trypanosoma cruzi inactivation in human platelet concentrates and plasma by a psoralen (amotosalen HCl) and long-wavelength UV.

Authors:  Wesley C Van Voorhis; Lynn K Barrett; Richard T Eastman; Ryan Alfonso; Kent Dupuis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Light based anti-infectives: ultraviolet C irradiation, photodynamic therapy, blue light, and beyond.

Authors:  Rui Yin; Tianhong Dai; Pinar Avci; Ana Elisa Serafim Jorge; Wanessa C M A de Melo; Daniela Vecchio; Ying-Ying Huang; Asheesh Gupta; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 5.547

Review 4.  Protecting the blood supply from emerging pathogens: the role of pathogen inactivation.

Authors:  Jean Pierre Allain; Celso Bianco; Morris A Blajchman; Mark E Brecher; Michael Busch; David Leiby; Lily Lin; Susan Stramer
Journal:  Transfus Med Rev       Date:  2005-04

Review 5.  Pathogen inactivation techniques.

Authors:  J P R Pelletier; S Transue; E L Snyder
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Haematol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.020

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.