Literature DB >> 10960318

Intellectual property. Coauthorship and coinventorship.

P Ducor1.   

Abstract

Although the accepted criteria used for inclusion as author or inventor are similar, the average number of authors in scientific articles is significantly higher than the number of inventors on the corresponding patents. This finding can be attributed to an artificial inflation of coauthors, to the exclusion of coinventors, or--more probably--to a mix of both causes. This article argues that the discrepancy between the numbers of coauthors and inventors can have significant legal consequences, as the exclusion of an inventor can render a U.S. patent invalid or seriously harm its value. A proposal aiming to avoid such consequences and taking into account legal as well as authorship credit considerations is described.

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach; International Committee of Medical Journal Editors

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10960318     DOI: 10.1126/science.289.5481.873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  3 in total

Review 1.  Profitable exchanges for scientists: the case of Swedish human embryonic stem cell research.

Authors:  Anders Persson; Sven Hemlin; Stellan Welin
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-12

Review 2.  Innovation and New Technologies in Spine Surgery, Circa 2020: A Fifty-Year Review.

Authors:  G Bryan Cornwall; Andrea Davis; William R Walsh; Ralph J Mobbs; Alexander Vaccaro
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2020-11-24

Review 3.  Can literature analysis identify innovation drivers in drug discovery?

Authors:  Pankaj Agarwal; David B Searls
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 84.694

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.