STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) effects on pulmonary arterial and venous flow compared to those of intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (IPPV) by using pulsed Doppler transesophageal echocardiography. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: University-affiliated hospital operating room. PATIENTS: 13 ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing lower abdominal or lower extremity surgery. INTERVENTIONS: PATIENTS had total IV anesthesia with propofol and fentanyl. After anesthesia induction, a transesophageal echocardiography probe was inserted into the esophagus. IPPV (TV, 8-10 mL/kg; respiratory rate, 10-12 cycles/min; I/E ratio, 1:2; FIO(2), 1.0) and HFJV (driving pressure, 0.5-0.6 kgf/cm(2); frequency,3 Hz; I/E ratio, 1:1; FIO(2), 1.0) were performed under hemodynamically stable conditions. MEASUREMENTS: Pulmonary-arterial-flow velocity, pulmonary-venous-flow velocity, left ventricular short-axis view, and airway-pressure curve were recorded simultaneously. Parameters measured were: hemodynamic variables, arterial blood gases, inspiratory airway pressure; [from pulmonary-arterial-flow velocity] pre-ejection period (PEP), acceleration time (AT), right ventricular ejection time (RVET), and their ratios (PEP/AT, AT/RVET); [from pulmonary-venous-flow velocity] time-velocity integral of the first systolic wave (S1), second systolic wave (S2), and diastolic wave (D), and systolic fraction (integral S1 + S2/S1+ S2 + D); [from M-mode] left-ventricular-end systolic volume, left-ventricular-end diastolic volume (LVEDV), stroke volume, cardiac output, and ejection fraction, using Teichholz's method. MAIN RESULTS: Peak inspiratory airway pressure during HFJV was significantly lower than that during IPPV. HFJV significantly decreased PEP/AT, correlating positively with pulmonary arterial pressure, and significantly increased AT and AT/RVET, correlating negatively with pulmonary arterial pressure. Systolic fraction, correlating negatively with left atrial pressure, increased significantly during HFJV, as did LVEDV, stroke volume, cardiac output, and ejection fraction. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that, in comparison to IPPV, HFJV significantly decreases pulmonary arterial pressure and left atrial pressure, resulting in significant increases in cardiac output and ejection fraction in healthy anesthetized adults.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) effects on pulmonary arterial and venous flow compared to those of intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (IPPV) by using pulsed Doppler transesophageal echocardiography. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: University-affiliated hospital operating room. PATIENTS: 13 ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing lower abdominal or lower extremity surgery. INTERVENTIONS:PATIENTS had total IV anesthesia with propofol and fentanyl. After anesthesia induction, a transesophageal echocardiography probe was inserted into the esophagus. IPPV (TV, 8-10 mL/kg; respiratory rate, 10-12 cycles/min; I/E ratio, 1:2; FIO(2), 1.0) and HFJV (driving pressure, 0.5-0.6 kgf/cm(2); frequency,3 Hz; I/E ratio, 1:1; FIO(2), 1.0) were performed under hemodynamically stable conditions. MEASUREMENTS: Pulmonary-arterial-flow velocity, pulmonary-venous-flow velocity, left ventricular short-axis view, and airway-pressure curve were recorded simultaneously. Parameters measured were: hemodynamic variables, arterial blood gases, inspiratory airway pressure; [from pulmonary-arterial-flow velocity] pre-ejection period (PEP), acceleration time (AT), right ventricular ejection time (RVET), and their ratios (PEP/AT, AT/RVET); [from pulmonary-venous-flow velocity] time-velocity integral of the first systolic wave (S1), second systolic wave (S2), and diastolic wave (D), and systolic fraction (integral S1 + S2/S1+ S2 + D); [from M-mode] left-ventricular-end systolic volume, left-ventricular-end diastolic volume (LVEDV), stroke volume, cardiac output, and ejection fraction, using Teichholz's method. MAIN RESULTS: Peak inspiratory airway pressure during HFJV was significantly lower than that during IPPV. HFJV significantly decreased PEP/AT, correlating positively with pulmonary arterial pressure, and significantly increased AT and AT/RVET, correlating negatively with pulmonary arterial pressure. Systolic fraction, correlating negatively with left atrial pressure, increased significantly during HFJV, as did LVEDV, stroke volume, cardiac output, and ejection fraction. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that, in comparison to IPPV, HFJV significantly decreases pulmonary arterial pressure and left atrial pressure, resulting in significant increases in cardiac output and ejection fraction in healthy anesthetized adults.
Authors: Michael A Kuluz; P Brian Smith; Sarah P Mears; Jennifer R Benjamin; Elisabeth T Tracy; W Lee Williford; Ronald N Goldberg; Henry E Rice; C Michael Cotten Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 2.545