Literature DB >> 10958911

Seven experiments on pattern vision of the honeybee, with a model.

A Horridge1.   

Abstract

When vertically presented patterns are fixed in relation to the point of choice of the bees, the locations of areas of colour or black can be discriminated in the vertical direction, and in the horizontal direction when the bees use some mark with green contrast on which to stabilize. The bees can fixate on a radial pattern, a spot, or a ring of spots. Resolution depends on fixation, which depends on green contrast, but the discrimination of locations then depends on the photon flux at green and blue receptors. The model proposes that, when the eye is stabilised, a tonic channel from all receptor types is activated in the region of the eye that looks at the cue. This channel generates a perceptual space in which location, colour and size contribute to a signature for each cue in each eye. In other channels of processing, the stimulus is the phasic modulation of green receptors by edges, and these pathways are colour blind. When the patterns are composed of bars, the cues are the radial and tangential edges and the integrated edge orientation, irrespective of shuffling of locations on the target. Orientation can be detected in fuzzy edges with a gradient of black to white over about 60 degrees subtended from the point of choice. These cues correspond to the response profiles of large-field, phasic, coarsely tuned filters. There is no evidence that cues from edges have a spatial tag. The model also proposes that each filter for average orientation, or radial or tangential edges, corresponds to an ascending succession of phasic neurones. Each processing channel generates a perceptual space where combinations of related cues form signatures, and at least one signature is passed to memory as an index item. A pattern may generate several signatures but patterns are discriminated only when their signatures differ. In the bee there is no evidence for the re-assembly of the pattern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10958911     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00096-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  6 in total

Review 1.  Recognition of a familiar place by the honeybee (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  G A Horridge
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Honeybees can discriminate between Monet and Picasso paintings.

Authors:  Wen Wu; Antonio M Moreno; Jason M Tangen; Judith Reinhard
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  The effect of complexity on the discrimination of oriented bars by the honeybee (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  G A Horridge
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-07-31       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Insect Bio-inspired Neural Network Provides New Evidence on How Simple Feature Detectors Can Enable Complex Visual Generalization and Stimulus Location Invariance in the Miniature Brain of Honeybees.

Authors:  Mark Roper; Chrisantha Fernando; Lars Chittka
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Functional Significance of Labellum Pattern Variation in a Sexually Deceptive Orchid (Ophrys heldreichii): Evidence of Individual Signature Learning Effects.

Authors:  Kerstin Stejskal; Martin Streinzer; Adrian Dyer; Hannes F Paulus; Johannes Spaethe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Neural coding in the visual system of Drosophila melanogaster: How do small neural populations support visually guided behaviours?

Authors:  Alex D M Dewar; Antoine Wystrach; Andrew Philippides; Paul Graham
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 4.475

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.