Literature DB >> 10958249

Effects of bromocriptine and haloperidol on prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response in man.

K A Abduljawad1, R W Langley, C M Bradshaw, E Szabadi.   

Abstract

Experiments with animals have shown that D2 dopamine (DA) receptors are involved in prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex (suppression of the reflex response evoked by a loud sound by prior presentation of a low-intensity stimulus). The present experiment attempted to extend this observation to man. Twelve healthy males (18-30 years), screened for normal hearing thresholds, participated in four sessions in which they received oral doses of placebo, bromocriptine 1.25 mg (a D2 receptor agonist), haloperidol 3 mg (a D2 receptor antagonist) and combined treatment with bromocriptine 1.25 mg+haloperidol 3 mg, according to a balanced double-blind protocol. Thirty-minute electromyographic recordings from the orbicularis oculi muscle of the right eye were carried out 120 min after ingestion of haloperidol and/or 90 min after ingestion of bromocriptine. Subjects received 36 40-msec sound pulses (115 dB), separated by variable intervals (mean 25 sec); in 24 of the trials the pulse was preceded by a 40-msec prepulse (75 dB in 12 trials and 85 dB in 12 trials; prepulse-pulse interval, 120 msec). The amplitude of the startle response was not significantly altered by any of the active treatments. Under the placebo condition, both 75- and 85-dB prepulses inhibited the startle response. Bromocriptine significantly attenuated this prepulse inhibition; haloperidol also produced a small but statistically significant attenuation of prepulse inhibition. Haloperidol significantly antagonized the attenuation of prepulse inhibition produced by bromocriptine. Neither drug altered self-rated alertness, physiological finger tremor, systolic or diastolic blood pressure or salivation. Bromocriptine significantly suppressed and haloperidol significantly elevated serum prolactin levels, these changes being absent when the two drugs were given in combination. The results provide evidence for the involvement of D2 DA receptors in prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex in man.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10958249     DOI: 10.1177/026988119801200302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0269-8811            Impact factor:   4.153


  8 in total

1.  Role of purinergic P2X4 receptors in regulating striatal dopamine homeostasis and dependent behaviors.

Authors:  Sheraz Khoja; Vivek Shah; Damaris Garcia; Liana Asatryan; Michael W Jakowec; Daryl L Davies
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 5.372

2.  The effects of dopamine agonists on prepulse inhibition in healthy men depend on baseline PPI values.

Authors:  Panos Bitsios; Stella G Giakoumaki; Sophia Frangou
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Human and animal studies of schizophrenia-related gating deficits.

Authors:  G A Light; D L Braff
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Dopamine agonists disrupt visual latent inhibition in normal males using a within-subject paradigm.

Authors:  Neal R Swerdlow; Nora Stephany; Lindsay C Wasserman; Jo Talledo; Richard Sharp; Pamela P Auerbach
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Proline affects brain function in 22q11DS children with the low activity COMT 158 allele.

Authors:  Jacob A S Vorstman; Bruce I Turetsky; Monique E J Sijmens-Morcus; Monique G de Sain; Bert Dorland; Mirjam Sprong; Eric F Rappaport; Frits A Beemer; Beverly S Emanuel; René S Kahn; Herman van Engeland; Chantal Kemner
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  The dopamine augmenter L-DOPA does not affect positive mood in healthy human volunteers.

Authors:  John Liggins; Robert O Pihl; Chawki Benkelfat; Marco Leyton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Comparative Analysis of Dopaminergic and Cholinergic Mechanisms of Sensory and Sensorimotor Gating in Healthy Individuals and in Patients With Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Andrey T Proshin
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 8.  Tics: neurological disorders determined by a deficit in sensorimotor gating processes.

Authors:  Edoardo Dalmato Schilke; Lucio Tremolizzo; Ildebrando Appollonio; Carlo Ferrarese
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.830

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.