Literature DB >> 10957733

Evaluation of a telemedicine link between Darwin and Adelaide to facilitate cancer management.

I N Olver1, S Selva-Nayagam.   

Abstract

The videoconferencing link between the Royal Adelaide Hospital Cancer Centre in South Australia and the Royal Darwin Hospital in the Northern Territory was established to allow Darwin clinicians to discuss cases in multidisciplinary oncology meetings at the tertiary referral center. This was evaluated by questionnaires distributed to the 20 health professionals involved and a group of 8 patients with breast cancer whose case histories had been discussed via videoconferencing. All clinicians found the telemedicine link to be either useful or very useful in at least one aspect of their practice. The major benefit was cited as enabling remote area clinicians to participate in multidisciplinary cancer meetings. Three of the 5 remote clinicians who practiced solely in the Northern Territory found that the telemedicine consultation increased their workload, while only 2 of 13 clinicians who practiced solely in South Australia reported an increase over their normal activities, the others reporting no difference. Benefits identified included better support of isolated clinicians, decreased travel, and enhanced education and peer review. Perceived difficulties were technical problems, the impersonal nature of the interaction, inability to examine the remote patient and lack of reimbursement for the consultation. Seven of the eight patients surveyed were satisfied or very satisfied with the telemedicine consultation. Four patients wished to have access to videotape of the multidisciplinary meeting. Of those requiring travel for treatment, all believed that the telemedicine consultation influenced their care and shortened their time away from home.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10957733     DOI: 10.1089/107830200415144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Telemed J        ISSN: 1078-3024


  13 in total

1.  Bridging the distance: a prospective tele-oncology study in Northern Norway.

Authors:  Tom Donnem; Bente Ervik; Kathrine Magnussen; Sigve Andersen; Doris Pastow; Sissel Andreassen; Tone Nørstad; Nina Helbekkmo; Roy M Bremnes; Tone Nordoy
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Role of telehealth/videoconferencing in managing cancer pain in rural American Indian communities.

Authors:  Emily Haozous; Ardith Z Doorenbos; George Demiris; Linda H Eaton; Cara Towle; Anjana Kundu; Dedra Buchwald
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  A telemedicine application to schedule temperature in an in vivo sensor network for cancer treatment.

Authors:  Rossi Kamal; Choong Seon Hong; Seok-Geun Lee
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.536

4.  Dr. Answer AI for prostate cancer: Intention to use, expected effects, performance, and concerns of urologists.

Authors:  Mi Jung Rho; Jihwan Park; Hyong Woo Moon; Choung-Soo Kim; Seong Soo Jeon; Minyong Kang; Ji Youl Lee
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2021-11-23

5.  Determinants of telemedicine adoption among financially distressed patients with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from a nationwide study.

Authors:  Abbas M Hassan; Carrie K Chu; Jun Liu; Rebekah Angove; Gabrielle Rocque; Kathleen D Gallagher; Adeyiza O Momoh; Nicole E Caston; Courtney P Williams; Stephanie Wheeler; Charles E Butler; Anaeze C Offodile
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.359

6.  Advances in cancer management: at what cost to medical student education?

Authors:  Darren L Starmer; Michael B Barton
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  The Impact of mHealth Interventions on Breast Cancer Awareness and Screening: Systematic Review Protocol.

Authors:  Temitope O Tokosi; Jill Fortuin; Tania S Douglas
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-12-21

8.  Researching COVID-19 tracing app acceptance: incorporating theory from the technological acceptance model.

Authors:  Felix Velicia-Martin; Juan-Pedro Cabrera-Sanchez; Eloy Gil-Cordero; Pedro R Palos-Sanchez
Journal:  PeerJ Comput Sci       Date:  2021-01-04

Review 9.  Benefits and drawbacks of videoconferencing for collaborating multidisciplinary teams in regional oncology networks: a scoping review.

Authors:  Lidia S van Huizen; Pieter U Dijkstra; Sjoukje van der Werf; Kees Ahaus; Jan Ln Roodenburg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Feasibility study of multidisciplinary oncology rounds by videoconference for surgeons in remote locales.

Authors:  Anna Gagliardi; Andy Smith; Vivek Goel; Denny DePetrillo
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.