Literature DB >> 10955873

Pilot trial of cytoprotection with amifostine given with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.

T R Chauncey1, T A Gooley, M E Lloid, M M Schubert, K Lilleby, L Holmberg, W I Bensinger.   

Abstract

In an attempt to limit toxicities associated with dose-intensive therapy used for transplant regimens, we performed a pilot study using amifostine with high-dose busulfan (12 mg/kg), melphalan (100 mg/m2), and thiotepa (500 mg/m2) in 21 patients with a variety of malignancies. After 3 days of oral busulfan, amifostine was given at 910 mg/m2 IV for 10 minutes, preceding the infusion of each of 2 doses of melphalan and thiotepa given for 4 days. Antiemetic premedication for amifostine was given to all patients. The median patient age was 50 years (range: 32-65 years). Twenty-one patients received 82 separate amifostine infusions. One patient discontinued amifostine after the second dose because of severe nausea and emesis, and two infusions were temporarily held secondary to hypotension. Of these 82 cycles, there was a total of 37 episodes of nausea/vomiting, 28 episodes of sneezing, 11 episodes of flushing, and 1 episode of oral paresthesia. Systolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure decreased by a mean of 8.4 mm Hg and 5.0 mm Hg, respectively. In general, the infusion was well tolerated. Patients were observed until discharge home (N = 15), until initiation of an additional tandem transplant procedure (N = 4), or until death (N = 2). All twenty-one patients experienced nonhematologic toxicities grade II or greater. Grade II toxicities included mucositis (N = 21), gastrointestinal (N = 3), skin (N = 1), and liver (N = 1), and grade III toxicities included liver (N = 1). Mucositis was also scored according to a detailed toxicity assessment. Mucositis did not appear to be improved with amifostine when compared with a control group of patients not receiving amifostine. Renal dysfunction after transplantation was decreased in the amifostine group, whereas there was no significant effect on posttransplant hepatic dysfunction. Although these data demonstrate the feasibility of delivering parenteral amifostine in conjunction with dose-intensive chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, there was no evidence of a significant reduction in nonmarrow toxicities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10955873     DOI: 10.1097/00000421-200008000-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  4 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of amifostine for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients.

Authors:  Ourania Nicolatou-Galitis; Triantafyllia Sarri; Joanne Bowen; Mario Di Palma; Vassilios E Kouloulias; Pasquale Niscola; Dorothea Riesenbeck; Monique Stokman; Wim Tissing; Eric Yeoh; Sharon Elad; Rajesh V Lalla
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Amifostine: an update on its clinical status as a cytoprotectant in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy and its potential therapeutic application in myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  C R Culy; C M Spencer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Renal function following hematological stem cell transplantation in childhood.

Authors:  Ludwig Patzer; Karim Kentouche; Felix Ringelmann; Joachim Misselwitz
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2003-04-29       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  Treating oral mucositis with a supersaturated calcium phosphate rinse: comparison with control in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Miroslaw Markiewicz; Monika Dzierzak-Mietla; Andrzej Frankiewicz; Patrycja Zielinska; Anna Koclega; Malgorzata Kruszelnicka; Slawomira Kyrcz-Krzemien
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.603

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.