Literature DB >> 10955405

Occupational risks for lung cancer among nonsmokers.

H Pohlabeln1, P Boffetta, W Ahrens, F Merletti, A Agudo, E Benhamou, S Benhamou, I Brüske-Hohlfeld, G Ferro, C Fortes, M Kreuzer, A Mendes, F Nyberg, G Pershagen, R Saracci, G Schmid, J Siemiatycki, L Simonato, E Whitley, H E Wichmann, C Winck, P Zambon, K H Jöckel.   

Abstract

We conducted a case-control study in 12 European study centers to evaluate the role of occupational risk factors among nonsmokers. We obtained detailed occupational histories from 650 nonsmoking cases (509 females/141 males) and 1,542 nonsmoking controls (1,011 females/531 males). On the basis of an a priori definition of occupations and industries that are known (list A) or suspected (list B) to be associated with lung carcinogenesis, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) for these occupations, using unconditional logistic regression models and adjusting for sex, age, and center effects. Among nonsmoking men, an excess relative risk was observed among those who had worked in list-A occupations [OR = 1.52; 95% confidence interval (C) = 0.78-2.97] but not in list-B occupations (OR = 1.05; 95%), CI = 0.60-1.83). Among nonsmoking women, there was an elevation of risk for list-A occupations (OR = 1.50; 95% CI = 0.49-4.53), although this estimate was imprecise, given that less than 1% of cases and controls were exposed. Exposure to list-B occupations was associated with an increase in relative risk (OR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.09-2.63) in females, but not in males. Women who had been laundry workers or dry cleaners had an OR of 1.83 (95% CI = 0.98-3.40). Our findings confirm that certain occupational exposures are associated with an increased risk for lung cancer among both female and male nonsmokers; however, knowledge on occupational lung carcinogens is biased toward agents to which mainly men are exposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10955405     DOI: 10.1097/00001648-200009000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  14 in total

1.  Occupational and environmental exposures and lung cancer in an industrialised area in Italy.

Authors:  V Fano; P Michelozzi; C Ancona; A Capon; F Forastiere; C A Perucci
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  Lung cancer in never smokers: clinical epidemiology and environmental risk factors.

Authors:  Jonathan M Samet; Erika Avila-Tang; Paolo Boffetta; Lindsay M Hannan; Susan Olivo-Marston; Michael J Thun; Charles M Rudin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  What proportion of lung cancer in never-smokers can be attributed to known risk factors?

Authors:  Julia Sisti; Paolo Boffetta
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 4.  Lung cancer risk in painters: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Neela Guha; Franco Merletti; Nelson Kyle Steenland; Andrea Altieri; Vincent Cogliano; Kurt Straif
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Occupational risk of lung cancer among lifetime non-smoking women in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  A Pronk; J Coble; B-T Ji; X-O Shu; N Rothman; G Yang; Y-T Gao; W Zheng; W-H Chow
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 6.  Critical review of the epidemiological literature on occupational exposure to perchloroethylene and cancer.

Authors:  Kenneth A Mundt; Thomas Birk; Margaret T Burch
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-07-29       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Occupation, gender, race, and lung cancer.

Authors:  Sania Amr; Beverly Wolpert; Christopher A Loffredo; Yun-Ling Zheng; Peter G Shields; Raymond Jones; Curtis C Harris
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.162

8.  Meta- and pooled analysis of GSTP1 polymorphism and lung cancer: a HuGE-GSEC review.

Authors:  Michele L Cote; Wei Chen; Daryn W Smith; Simone Benhamou; Christine Bouchardy; Dorota Butkiewicz; Kwun M Fong; Manuel Gené; Ari Hirvonen; Chikako Kiyohara; Jill E Larsen; Pinpin Lin; Ole Raaschou-Nielsen; Andrew C Povey; Edyta Reszka; Angela Risch; Joachim Schneider; Ann G Schwartz; Mette Sorensen; Jordi To-Figueras; Shinkan Tokudome; Yuepu Pu; Ping Yang; Angela S Wenzlaff; Harriet Wikman; Emanuela Taioli
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Occupational risk factors have to be considered in the definition of high-risk lung cancer populations.

Authors:  P Wild; M Gonzalez; E Bourgkard; N Courouble; C Clément-Duchêne; Y Martinet; J Févotte; C Paris
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Lung cancer and occupation in a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Dario Consonni; Sara De Matteis; Jay H Lubin; Sholom Wacholder; Margaret Tucker; Angela Cecilia Pesatori; Neil E Caporaso; Pier Alberto Bertazzi; Maria Teresa Landi
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.