Literature DB >> 10954783

Measurement of bone density around total knee arthroplasty using fan-beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.

T Soininvaara1, H Kröger, J S Jurvelin, H Miettinen, O Suomalainen, E Alhava.   

Abstract

The clinical survival of joint arthroplasties is clearly associated with the quality of surrounding bone environment. Bone mineral density (BMD) is an important measure of bone strength and quality. Periprosthetic BMD can be measured by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with special software algorithms. We studied short-term reproducibility of the periprosthetic BMD measurements after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in 30 patients with primary osteoarthrosis. The operated knees and the contralateral control knees were measured twice and the results were expressed as a coefficient of variation (CV%). The average precision error was 3.1% in femoral regions of interest (ROI) and 2.9% in tibial ROIs after TKA. In the prosthesis-free control knees, CV% were similar; 3.2% and 2.5%, respectively. The best precision was found in the femoral diaphyses above the implant (1.3%), whereas the least reproducible BMD was determined in the patellar region of the TKA knees (6.9%). Our results confirm that DXA measures precisely small bone mineral changes around TKA and makes it possible to follow bone remodeling DXA and may provide a feasible method for monitoring TKA in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10954783     DOI: 10.1007/s002230001111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  7 in total

1.  Influence of the tibial stem design on bone density after cemented total knee arthroplasty: a prospective seven-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero; Manuel A Garcia-Sandoval; Jose M Fernandez-Carreira; Richard Gava
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Loss of tibial bone density in patients with rotating- or fixed-platform TKA.

Authors:  Jacob T Munro; Salil Pandit; Cameron G Walker; Mark Clatworthy; Rocco P Pitto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Densitometric evaluation of bone-prosthetic counterface in hip and knee arthroplasty with modern implants.

Authors:  Andrea Cozzi Lepri; Marco Giorgini; Carla Signorini; Christian Carulli; Roberto Civinini; Maria Luisa Brandi; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2016-10-05

4.  Bone mineral density after spinal cord injury: a reliable method for knee measurement.

Authors:  Richard K Shields; Janet Schlechte; Shauna Dudley-Javoroski; Bradley D Zwart; Steven D Clark; Susan A Grant; Vicki M Mattiace
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Distal femoral bone mineral density decreases following patellofemoral arthroplasty: 1-year follow-up study of 14 patients.

Authors:  Hans-Peter W van Jonbergen; Kenneth Koster; Luc Labey; Bernardo Innocenti; Albert van Kampen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Does stress shielding occur with the use of long-stem prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Sathappan S Sathappan; Hee-Nee Pang; Alikkal Manoj; Thambayah Ashwin; K Satku
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Periprosthetic tibial bone mineral density changes after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Antti Jaroma; Tarja Soininvaara; Heikki Kröger
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.717

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.