Literature DB >> 10954467

Palpable breast masses: is there a role for percutaneous imaging-guided core biopsy?

L Liberman1, L A Ernberg, A Heerdt, M F Zakowski, E A Morris, L R LaTrenta, A F Abramson, D D Dershaw.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate percutaneous imaging-guided core biopsy in the assessment of selected palpable breast masses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 1388 consecutive breast lesions that had percutaneous imaging-guided core biopsy, 155 (11%) were palpable. Palpable masses referred for percutaneous imaging-guided core biopsy included lesions that were small, deep, mobile, vaguely palpable, or multiple. Biopsy guidance was sonography in 140 lesions (90%) and stereotaxis in 15 (10%). Surgical correlation or minimum of 2 years follow-up is available in 115 palpable masses in 107 women. Medical records, imaging studies, and histologic findings were reviewed.
RESULTS: Of 115 palpable breast masses, 98 (85%) were referred by surgeons to the radiology department for percutaneous imaging-guided core biopsy and 88 (77%) had percutaneous imaging-guided core biopsy on the day of initial evaluation at our institution. Percutaneous imaging-guided core biopsy spared additional diagnostic tissue sampling in 79 (74%) of 107 women, including 57 women with carcinoma and 22 women with benign findings. Percutaneous imaging-guided core biopsy did not spare additional tissue sampling in 28 women (26%), including 15 women in whom surgical biopsy was recommended on the basis of percutaneous biopsy findings and 13 women with benign (n = 7) or malignant (n = 6) percutaneous biopsy findings who chose to undergo diagnostic surgical biopsy.
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous imaging-guided core biopsy is useful in the evaluation of palpable breast masses that are small, deep, mobile, vaguely palpable, or multiple. In this study, percutaneous imaging-guided core biopsy spared additional diagnostic tissue sampling in 74% women with palpable breast masses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10954467     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.175.3.1750779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  6 in total

1.  Breast cancer early detection and diagnostic capacity in Uganda.

Authors:  John R Scheel; Mahbod J Giglou; Sophie Segel; Jackson Orem; Vivien Tsu; Moses Galukande; Jimmy Okello; Gertrude Nakigudde; Noleb Mugisha; Zeridah Muyinda; Benjamin O Anderson; Catherine Duggan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Patient Complaints in Benign vs. Malignant Breast Disease.

Authors:  Faramarz Karimian; Mohammad Reza Keramati; Ali Abbaszadeh-Kasbi
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-02-21

3.  Clinical feasibility of microscopically-guided breast needle biopsy using a fiber-optic probe with computer-aided detection.

Authors:  Adam M Zysk; Freddy T Nguyen; Eric J Chaney; Jan G Kotynek; Uretz J Oliphant; Frank J Bellafiore; Patricia A Johnson; Kendrith M Rowland; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-10

4.  Ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy of breast lesions.

Authors:  Luis Apesteguía; Luis Javier Pina
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2011-04-15

5.  Image guided versus palpation guided core needle biopsy of palpable breast masses: a prospective study.

Authors:  Smriti Hari; Swati Kumari; Anurag Srivastava; Sanjay Thulkar; Sandeep Mathur; Prasad Thotton Veedu
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Evaluating the role of strain ratio elastography in determining malignancy potential and calculating objective BIRADS US scores using ultrasonography and elastography features.

Authors:  Deniz Özel; Betül Duran Özel
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.