BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neuroimaging techniques such as diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MR imaging have been proposed as tools for advanced diagnosis in hyperacute ischemic stroke. There is, however, substantial doubt regarding the feasibility and practicality of applying MR imaging for the diagnosis of stroke on a routine basis, especially with respect to possible delay for specific treatment such as thrombolysis. In this study, we tested whether MR imaging of stroke is safe, fast, and accurate, and whether the gain in additional information can be used in the daily routine without a loss of time and a risk of suboptimal treatment for the patient with stroke. METHODS: Between September 1997 and August 1999, 64 patients with acute ischemic stroke were recruited for MR imaging (ie, diffusion-weighted imaging, perfusion-weighted imaging, MR angiography, T2-weighted imaging) after a baseline CT was performed. We evaluated practicality and feasibility of MR imaging of stroke by analyzing the intervals between symptom onset, arrival, CT, and MR imaging. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients (mean age, 60.9 years) underwent routine CT and MR imaging within 12 hours after stroke onset (n=25, < or =3 hr; n=26, 3-6 hr; n=13, 6-12 hr). Median times to arrival, start of CT, MR imaging, and between CT and MR imaging were 1.625 hours, 2 hours, 3.875 hours, and 1 hour, respectively. Intervals between symptom onset and MR imaging (P<.005), arrival and MR imaging (P<.002), and CT and MR imaging (P=.0007) differed significantly between the early phase of the study and after November 1998, whereas the intervals between symptom onset and arrival, symptom onset and CT, and arrival and CT did not. Hemorrhage could be excluded in all; a perfusion/diffusion match or mismatch could be shown in 63 of 64 patients. CONCLUSION: Practice and experience with MR imaging in a stroke team significantly reduce the time and effort required to perform this technique and thus make 24-hour availability for MR imaging of stroke practical. Assessment of patients with hyperacute stroke is rapid and comprehensive. Image quality can be substantially improved by head immobilization and by mild sedation, if necessary.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neuroimaging techniques such as diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MR imaging have been proposed as tools for advanced diagnosis in hyperacute ischemic stroke. There is, however, substantial doubt regarding the feasibility and practicality of applying MR imaging for the diagnosis of stroke on a routine basis, especially with respect to possible delay for specific treatment such as thrombolysis. In this study, we tested whether MR imaging of stroke is safe, fast, and accurate, and whether the gain in additional information can be used in the daily routine without a loss of time and a risk of suboptimal treatment for the patient with stroke. METHODS: Between September 1997 and August 1999, 64 patients with acute ischemic stroke were recruited for MR imaging (ie, diffusion-weighted imaging, perfusion-weighted imaging, MR angiography, T2-weighted imaging) after a baseline CT was performed. We evaluated practicality and feasibility of MR imaging of stroke by analyzing the intervals between symptom onset, arrival, CT, and MR imaging. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients (mean age, 60.9 years) underwent routine CT and MR imaging within 12 hours after stroke onset (n=25, < or =3 hr; n=26, 3-6 hr; n=13, 6-12 hr). Median times to arrival, start of CT, MR imaging, and between CT and MR imaging were 1.625 hours, 2 hours, 3.875 hours, and 1 hour, respectively. Intervals between symptom onset and MR imaging (P<.005), arrival and MR imaging (P<.002), and CT and MR imaging (P=.0007) differed significantly between the early phase of the study and after November 1998, whereas the intervals between symptom onset and arrival, symptom onset and CT, and arrival and CT did not. Hemorrhage could be excluded in all; a perfusion/diffusion match or mismatch could be shown in 63 of 64 patients. CONCLUSION: Practice and experience with MR imaging in a stroke team significantly reduce the time and effort required to perform this technique and thus make 24-hour availability for MR imaging of stroke practical. Assessment of patients with hyperacute stroke is rapid and comprehensive. Image quality can be substantially improved by head immobilization and by mild sedation, if necessary.
Authors: M E Moseley; J Kucharczyk; J Mintorovitch; Y Cohen; J Kurhanewicz; N Derugin; H Asgari; D Norman Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1990-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: K O Lövblad; A E Baird; G Schlaug; A Benfield; B Siewert; B Voetsch; A Connor; C Burzynski; R R Edelman; S Warach Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 1997-08 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: P A Barber; D G Darby; P M Desmond; Q Yang; R P Gerraty; D Jolley; G A Donnan; B M Tress; S M Davis Journal: Neurology Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: W Hacke; M Kaste; C Fieschi; R von Kummer; A Davalos; D Meier; V Larrue; E Bluhmki; S Davis; G Donnan; D Schneider; E Diez-Tejedor; P Trouillas Journal: Lancet Date: 1998-10-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: J P Mohr; J Biller; S K Hilal; W T Yuh; T K Tatemichi; S Hedges; E Tali; H Nguyen; I Mun; H P Adams Journal: Stroke Date: 1995-05 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: R Handschu; S Fateh-Moghadam; E Klotz; A Schmid; B Stemper; J G Heckmann; W J Huk; B Neundörfer; B F Tomandl Journal: Nervenarzt Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 1.214
Authors: Daniel Sanák; Vladimír Nosál'; David Horák; Andrea Bártková; Kamil Zelenák; Roman Herzig; Jirí Bucil; David Skoloudík; Stanislav Burval; Viera Cisariková; Ivanka Vlachová; Martin Köcher; Jana Zapletalová; Egon Kurca; Petr Kanovský Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2006-08-29 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Shreyansh Shah; Marie Luby; Karen Poole; Teresa Morella; Elizabeth Keller; Richard T Benson; John K Lynch; Zurab Nadareishvili; Amie W Hsia Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-05-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Olvert A Berkhemer; Shervin Kamalian; R Gilberto González; Charles B L M Majoie; Albert J Yoo Journal: Cardiovasc Eng Technol Date: 2013-12-01 Impact factor: 2.495
Authors: M Luby; J Hong; J G Merino; J K Lynch; A W Hsia; A Magadán; S S Song; L L Latour; S Warach Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-02-28 Impact factor: 3.825