Literature DB >> 10952793

The paracetamol absorption test: a useful addition to the enteral nutrition algorithm?

J Cohen1, A Aharon, P Singer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enteral nutrition in critically ill patients given via the nasogastric route is often decreased or stopped because of large gastric residual volumes. AIM: To assess the effect of continuing enteral nutrition in patients with an elevated gastric residual volume but normal gastric emptying by the paracetamol absorption test.
METHODS: The paracetamol absorption test was performed on all patients receiving enteral nutrition via a nasogastric tube who had a residual volume (assessed every 8 hours) of >150 ml or more than twice the hourly infusion rate. Patients were then divided into 2 groups according to the result of the test: Group 1 (n=8), normal gastric emptying; and Group II (n=24), abnormal gastric emptying. Group I continued to receive enteral nutrition. In Group II feeding was interrupted in 18 patients and prokinetic agents administered, while a subgroup of six patients continued to receive enteral nutrition without prokinetic agents. All patients were followed for evidence of delayed gastric emptying and aspiration.
RESULTS: Residual volumes were similarly elevated in both groups (p=0.25). Enteral nutrition was continued in Group I with no adverse effects. Prokinetic agents allowed enteral nutrition to be resumed in 88% of the 18 Group II patients. Enteral nutrition in the subgroup had to be stopped because of persistently elevated residual volumes.
CONCLUSION: The paracetamol absorption test may be normal in patients with relatively high gastric residual volumes. These patients may continue to receive enteral nutrition. Copyright 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10952793     DOI: 10.1054/clnu.2000.0097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0261-5614            Impact factor:   7.324


  6 in total

1.  Effect of preoperative feeding on gastric emptying following spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Alen Protic; Dean Turina; Dubravka Matanić; Josip Spanjol; Marta Zuvic-Butorac; Alan Sustic
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 2.  Mechanisms underlying feed intolerance in the critically ill: implications for treatment.

Authors:  Adam Deane; Marianne J Chapman; Robert J Fraser; Laura K Bryant; Carly Burgstad; Nam Q Nguyen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Gastrointestinal Dysfunction and Feeding Intolerance in Critical Illness: Do We Need an Objective Scoring System?

Authors:  Stephen A McClave; Jill Gualdoni; Annie Nagengast; Luis S Marsano; Kathryn Bandy; Robert G Martindale
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2020-01-07

4.  An examination of gastrointestinal absorption using the acetaminophen absorption test in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Daniel L Southren; Alexa D Nardone; Adeniran A Haastrup; Russel J Roberts; Marvin G Chang; Edward A Bittner
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.204

5.  The efficacy and safety of itopride in feeding intolerance of critically ill patients receiving enteral nutrition: a randomized, double-blind study.

Authors:  Eman Mohamed Elmokadem; Radwa Maher El Borolossy; Ahmed M Bassiouny; Maha Gamil Hanna; Ebtissam Abdel Ghaffar Darweesh; Nagwa A Sabri
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 6.  Gastrointestinal dysmotility in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Theodoros Ladopoulos; Maria Giannaki; Christina Alexopoulou; Athanasia Proklou; Emmanuel Pediaditis; Eumorfia Kondili
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.