BACKGROUND: We evaluated the effect of weight loss (WL) or aerobic exercise (AEX) on pulmonary function in middle-aged and older (46-80 years) obese, sedentary men to determine the effect of reductions in body weight and increases in cardiorespiratory fitness on pulmonary function. METHODS: Subjects were randomly assigned to WL (n = 73), AEX (n = 71), or control (n = 26) groups. Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), body composition and anthropometrics, pulmonary function, and arterial blood gases were measured at baseline and after interventions. RESULTS: The 35 subjects who completed WL decreased weight by 11%, body fat percentage by 21% (p < .001), waist circumference by 8%, waist-hip ratio by 2%, and fat-free mass by 3% (p < .05). This resulted in a 3% increase in forced vital capacity (FVC) (4.08 +/- 0.71 L vs 4.21 +/- 0.76 L), a 5% increase in total lung capacity (6.62 +/- 0.99 L vs 6.94 +/- 0.99 L), an 18% increase in functional residual capacity (3.09 +/- 0.58 L vs 3.66 +/- 0.79 L), and an 8% increase in residual volume (2.20 +/- 0.44 L vs 2.37 +/- 0.52 L), with no change in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), FEV1/FVC ratio, or carbon monoxide diffusing capacity. The change in FVC correlated with change in body weight (r = -.34, p < .05). The 38 subjects who completed AEX increased VO2max by 14%, with no change in pulmonary function. There were no changes in 8 control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: WL changes static lung volumes, not dynamic pulmonary function, in middle-aged and older, moderately obese, sedentary men. Some of the alterations in static lung function associated with aging may be due to the development of obesity and are modifiable by WL.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the effect of weight loss (WL) or aerobic exercise (AEX) on pulmonary function in middle-aged and older (46-80 years) obese, sedentary men to determine the effect of reductions in body weight and increases in cardiorespiratory fitness on pulmonary function. METHODS: Subjects were randomly assigned to WL (n = 73), AEX (n = 71), or control (n = 26) groups. Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), body composition and anthropometrics, pulmonary function, and arterial blood gases were measured at baseline and after interventions. RESULTS: The 35 subjects who completed WL decreased weight by 11%, body fat percentage by 21% (p < .001), waist circumference by 8%, waist-hip ratio by 2%, and fat-free mass by 3% (p < .05). This resulted in a 3% increase in forced vital capacity (FVC) (4.08 +/- 0.71 L vs 4.21 +/- 0.76 L), a 5% increase in total lung capacity (6.62 +/- 0.99 L vs 6.94 +/- 0.99 L), an 18% increase in functional residual capacity (3.09 +/- 0.58 L vs 3.66 +/- 0.79 L), and an 8% increase in residual volume (2.20 +/- 0.44 L vs 2.37 +/- 0.52 L), with no change in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), FEV1/FVC ratio, or carbon monoxide diffusing capacity. The change in FVC correlated with change in body weight (r = -.34, p < .05). The 38 subjects who completed AEX increased VO2max by 14%, with no change in pulmonary function. There were no changes in 8 control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: WL changes static lung volumes, not dynamic pulmonary function, in middle-aged and older, moderately obese, sedentary men. Some of the alterations in static lung function associated with aging may be due to the development of obesity and are modifiable by WL.
Authors: Lauren N Shaver; Daniel P Beavers; Jessica Kiel; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Kristen M Beavers Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-07-12 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Lei Wang; Francis H Y Green; Suzette M Smiley-Jewell; Kent E Pinkerton Journal: Semin Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-10-12 Impact factor: 3.119
Authors: Maan Moualla; Clifford Qualls; Alexander Arynchyn; Bharat Thyagarajan; Ravi Kalhan; Lewis J Smith; John J Carr; David R Jacobs; Akshay Sood Journal: Thorax Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 9.102