Literature DB >> 10951918

Avoiding anomalous newborns: preemptive abortion, treatment thresholds and the case of baby Messenger.

M L Gross1.   

Abstract

In its American context the case of baby Messenger, a preterm infant disconnected from life-support by his father and allowed to die has generated debate about neonatal treatment protocols. Limited by the legal and ethical norms of the United States, this case did not consider treatment protocols that might be available in other countries such as Denmark and Israel: threshold protocols whereby certain classes of newborns are not treated, and preemptive abortion allowing one to choose late-term abortion rather than risk delivery. Each offers a viable and ethically sound avenue for dealing with the economic and social expense of anomalous newborns by aborting or not treating those most likely to burden the health care system. Objections that these protocols are antithetical to American bioethical principles are considered but rejected as each policy answers to economic justice, utility and respect for autonomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Genetics and Reproduction; Professional Patient Relationship; State v. Messenger

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10951918      PMCID: PMC1733259          DOI: 10.1136/jme.26.4.242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  15 in total

1.  After feticide: coping with late-term abortion in Israel, western Europe, and the United States.

Authors:  M L Gross
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Making sense of State v Messenger.

Authors:  F I Clark
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  The messenger case.

Authors:  H Harrison
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  No sense making sense of State v Messenger.

Authors:  G G Messenger
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Birth weight-specific mortality for extremely low birth weight infants vanishes by four days of life: epidemiology and ethics in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  W Meadow; T Reimshisel; J Lantos
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 6.  Parental discretion in refusal of treatment for newborns. A real but limited right.

Authors:  J J Paris; M D Schreiber
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.430

7.  Ensuring a stillborn: the ethics of fetal lethal injection in late abortion.

Authors:  J C Callahan
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  1995

8.  "Minitouch" treatment of very low-birth-weight infants.

Authors:  T Jacobsen; J Grønvall; S Petersen; G E Andersen
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.299

9.  Fetal intracardiac potassium chloride injection to avoid the hopeless resuscitation of an abnormal abortus: I. Clinical issues.

Authors:  N B Isada; P G Pryde; M P Johnson; M Hallak; W B Blessed; M I Evans
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  On learning from mistakes.

Authors:  J C Fletcher
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  1995
View more
  1 in total

1.  Ethics of refusing parental requests to withhold or withdraw treatment from their premature baby.

Authors:  R J Boyle; R Salter; M W Arnander
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.903

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.