Literature DB >> 10949775

Primary cancer prevention trials.

E T Hawk1, S M Lippman.   

Abstract

Great progress has been made in cancer chemoprevention during the past 2 decades. Nevertheless, the field could benefit from the experiences of investigators studying the prevention of cardiovascular disease. During the past 50 years, prevention of cardiovascular disease has gone from a dream to a reality, with major clinical impact. The trend during the last 30 years has been impressive and sustained. From 1987 to 1994, there was a sustained major decrease in age-adjusted mortality from coronary heart disease in both men (from 3.1 to 2.2 per thousand persons) and women (from 1.1 to 0.9 per thousand persons). This trend is believed to have resulted from improvements in the treatment of myocardial infarction and, more substantively, from improvements in secondary prevention. This explanation is consistent with earlier computer simulations of trends in cardiovascular mortality during the 1980s, which estimated that 25% of the declines were attributable to primary prevention and 70% were caused by reductions in risk factors or treatment. The greatest effect of primary prevention had previously been noted in the late 1960s and 1970s. Most of these important findings occurred before cholesterol-lowering drugs became widely available, so further improvements are expected. Researchers in cancer prevention should follow in the footsteps of their cardiovascular colleagues. The tools are now available to make prevention of cancer a clinical reality. As the science of prevention improves, it must be remembered that effective and efficient preventive services do not help if they are not used. It is difficult to motivate practitioners and patients to implement preventive services. Also, preventive services are often considered a luxury. Persons without health insurance and those covered by Medicaid are much more likely to be diagnosed with late-stage cancer; therefore, they are key cohorts to target for effective preventive approaches. Finally, the most effective cancer prevention program will probably use both rational drug therapy targeting specific risk factors and public health efforts to promote healthy lifestyle choices in the population at large.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10949775     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-8588(05)70313-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0889-8588            Impact factor:   3.722


  5 in total

1.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Daniel Paquette; Daniel Reinharz
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2009-05

2.  Organizing the public health-clinical health interface: theoretical bases.

Authors:  Michèle St-Pierre; Daniel Reinharz; Jacques-Bernard Gauthier
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2006

3.  [Developing public health--primary care interfaces in Quebec: a case study].

Authors:  Jalila Jbilou; Daniel Reinharz
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2006-07

4.  Hierarchical Virtual Screening Based on Rocaglamide Derivatives to Discover New Potential Anti-Skin Cancer Agents.

Authors:  Igor V F Dos Santos; Rosivaldo S Borges; Guilherme M Silva; Lúcio R de Lima; Ruan S Bastos; Ryan S Ramos; Luciane B Silva; Carlos H T P da Silva; Cleydson B R Dos Santos
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-06-02

Review 5.  Cancer metastasis chemoprevention prevents circulating tumour cells from germination.

Authors:  Xiaodong Xie; Yumei Li; Shu Lian; Yusheng Lu; Lee Jia
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2022-10-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.