S C Smith1, J G Taylor, A M Stephen. 1. College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, 110 Science Place, Saskatoon, Canada, S7N 5C9.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to measure the reported use of nutrition information on food labels by a population of university students and to determine if label users differed from non-users in terms of gender and specific beliefs related to label information and diet-disease relationships, specifically fat and heart disease and fibre and cancer. DESIGN: A single-stage cluster sampling technique was used. Data was obtained using a self-administered, validated questionnaire. SETTING: The present investigation took place at the University of Saskatchewan, Canada in the autumn of 1997. SUBJECTS: : A total of 553 students in randomly selected classes in the College of Arts and Science took part in the survey (92% response rate). The sample consisted of roughly equal numbers of males and females, most between the ages of 18 and 24. RESULTS: There were approximately equal numbers of label users and non-users among males, while label users outnumbered non-users by almost four to one among females. The importance of nutrition information on food labels was the only belief that differed significantly between label users and non-users for both sexes. For females, no other beliefs distinguished label users from non-users. However, for males, significant differences were found between label users and non-users on the beliefs that nutrition information is truthful and that a relationship between fibre and cancer exists. CONCLUSIONS: Females appear to use food labels more often than do males. The only consistently observed difference between label users and non-users (male and female) was that users believed in the importance of nutrition information on food labels while non-users did not.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to measure the reported use of nutrition information on food labels by a population of university students and to determine if label users differed from non-users in terms of gender and specific beliefs related to label information and diet-disease relationships, specifically fat and heart disease and fibre and cancer. DESIGN: A single-stage cluster sampling technique was used. Data was obtained using a self-administered, validated questionnaire. SETTING: The present investigation took place at the University of Saskatchewan, Canada in the autumn of 1997. SUBJECTS: : A total of 553 students in randomly selected classes in the College of Arts and Science took part in the survey (92% response rate). The sample consisted of roughly equal numbers of males and females, most between the ages of 18 and 24. RESULTS: There were approximately equal numbers of label users and non-users among males, while label users outnumbered non-users by almost four to one among females. The importance of nutrition information on food labels was the only belief that differed significantly between label users and non-users for both sexes. For females, no other beliefs distinguished label users from non-users. However, for males, significant differences were found between label users and non-users on the beliefs that nutrition information is truthful and that a relationship between fibre and cancer exists. CONCLUSIONS: Females appear to use food labels more often than do males. The only consistently observed difference between label users and non-users (male and female) was that users believed in the importance of nutrition information on food labels while non-users did not.
Authors: Aunchalee E L Palmquist; Rachel Upton; Seungjin Lee; Abby T Panter; Don W Hadley; Laura M Koehly Journal: J Nutr Educ Behav Date: 2011-02-05 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: John E Lewis; Kristopher L Arheart; William G LeBlanc; Lora E Fleming; David J Lee; Evelyn P Davila; Alberto J Cabán-Martinez; Noella A Dietz; Kathryn E McCollister; Frank C Bandiera; John D Clark Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2009-09-23 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Lisa M Soederberg Miller; Carolyn A Sutter; Machelle D Wilson; Jacqueline J Bergman; Laurel A Beckett; Tanja N Gibson Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2018-01-11