Literature DB >> 10947821

Functional organization of auditory cortex in the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). III. Anatomical subdivisions and corticocortical connections.

E Budinger1, P Heil, H Scheich.   

Abstract

The auditory cortex of the Mongolian gerbil comprises several physiologically identified fields, including the primary (AI), anterior (AAF), dorsal (D), ventral (V), dorsoposterior (DP) and ventroposterior (VP) fields, as established previously with electrophysiological [Thomas et al. (1993) Eur. J. Neurosci., 5, 882] and functional metabolic techniques [Scheich et al. (1993) Eur. J. Neurosci., 5, 898]. Here we describe the cyto-, myelo- and chemoarchitecture and the corticocortical connections of the auditory cortex in this species. A central area of temporal cortex corresponding to AI and the rostrally adjacent AAF is distinguished from surrounding cortical areas by its koniocortical cytoarchitecture, by a higher density of myelinated fibres, predominantly in granular and infragranular layers, and by characteristic patterns of immunoreactivity for the calcium-binding protein parvalbumin (most intense staining in layers III/IV and VIa) and for the cytoskeletal neurofilament protein (antibody SMI-32; most intense staining in layers III, V and VI). Concerning the cortical connections, injections of the predominantly anterograde tracer biocytin into the four tonotopically organized fields AI, AAF, DP and VP yielded the following labelling patterns. (i) Labelled axons and terminals were seen within each injected field itself. (ii) Following injections into AI, labelled axons and terminals were also seen in the ipsilateral AAF, DP, VP, D and V, and in a hitherto undescribed possible auditory field, termed the ventromedial field (VM). Similarly, following injections into AAF, DP and VP, labelling was also seen in each of the noninjected fields, except in VM. (iii) Each field projects to its homotopic counterpart in the contralateral hemisphere. In addition, field AI projects to contralateral AAF, DP and VP, field DP to contralateral AI and VP, and field VP to contralateral AI and DP. (iv) Some retrogradely filled pyramidal neurons within the areas of terminal labelling indicate reciprocal connections between most fields, both ipsilateral and contralateral. (v) The labelled fibres within the injected and the target fields, both ipsilateral and contralateral, were arranged in continuous dorsoventral bands parallel to isofrequency contours. The more caudal the injection site in AI the more rostral was the label in AAF. This suggests divergent but frequency-specific connections within and, at least for AI and AAF, also across fields, both ipsilateral and contralateral. (vi) Projections to associative cortices (perirhinal, entorhinal, cingulate) and to other sensory cortices (olfactory, somatosensory, visual) from AAF, DP and VP appeared stronger than those from AI. These data support the differentiation of auditory cortical fields in the gerbil into at least 'core' (AI and AAF) and 'noncore' fields. They further reveal a complex pattern of interconnections within and between auditory cortical fields and other cortical areas, such that each field of auditory cortex has its unique set of connections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10947821     DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00142.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  47 in total

1.  Spectral integration in primary auditory cortex attributable to temporally precise convergence of thalamocortical and intracortical input.

Authors:  Max F K Happel; Marcus Jeschke; Frank W Ohl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Areas of cat auditory cortex as defined by neurofilament proteins expressing SMI-32.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Mellott; Estel Van der Gucht; Charles C Lee; Andres Carrasco; Jeffery A Winer; Stephen G Lomber
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  An auditory colliculothalamocortical brain slice preparation in mouse.

Authors:  Daniel A Llano; Bernard J Slater; Alexandria M H Lesicko; Kevin A Stebbings
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  All rodents are not the same: a modern synthesis of cortical organization.

Authors:  Leah Krubitzer; Katharine L Campi; Dylan F Cooke
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 1.808

5.  Enhanced cognitive flexibility in reversal learning induced by removal of the extracellular matrix in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Max F K Happel; Hartmut Niekisch; Laura L Castiblanco Rivera; Frank W Ohl; Matthias Deliano; Renato Frischknecht
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Information flow in the auditory cortical network.

Authors:  Troy A Hackett
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Diminished cortical inhibition in an aging mouse model of chronic tinnitus.

Authors:  Daniel A Llano; Jeremy Turner; Donald M Caspary
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Architectonic subdivisions of neocortex in the gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis).

Authors:  Peiyan Wong; Jon H Kaas
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.064

9.  Spatial profile and differential recruitment of GABAB modulate oscillatory activity in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Anne-Marie M Oswald; Brent Doiron; John Rinzel; Alex D Reyes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Anatomical and Functional Organization of Inhibitory Circuits in the Songbird Auditory Forebrain.

Authors:  Jin Kwon Jeong; Liisa A Tremere; Michael J Ryave; Victor C Vuong; Raphael Pinaud
Journal:  J Exp Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.