Literature DB >> 10947228

Usefulness of simultaneous detection of toxin A and glutamate dehydrogenase for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diseases.

F Barbut1, V Lalande, G Daprey, P Cohen, N Marle, B Burghoffer, J C Petit.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate an immunoassay (Triage; Biosite Diagnostics, BMD, France) for detecting both a specific antigen of Clostridium difficile (glutamate dehydrogenase [GDH]) and toxin A. Evaluation of the test was carried out in 304 fecal samples from patients suspected of having Clostridium difficile-associated diseases. The results with GDH and toxin A were compared with those of a culture and cytotoxicity assay (toxin B). The prevalence rates for toxin B-positive and culture-positive fecal samples were 11.2% and 25%, respectively. The sensitivity of the Triage immunoassay was 90.8% for GDH and 79.4% for toxin A. A negative result with both toxin A and GDH was very reliably able to eliminate a diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated disease (negative predictive value 99.6%). Triage is a very rapid (20 min) and easy-to-perform test. It could be useful for diagnostic purposes and also for detecting nontoxigenic strains in epidemiogical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10947228     DOI: 10.1007/s100960000297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  8 in total

1.  Effective detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile by a two-step algorithm including tests for antigen and cytotoxin.

Authors:  John R Ticehurst; Deborah Z Aird; Lisa M Dam; Anita P Borek; John T Hargrove; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Prevalence and genetic characterization of toxin A variant strains of Clostridium difficile among adults and children with diarrhea in France.

Authors:  Frédéric Barbut; Valérie Lalande; Béatrice Burghoffer; Huong Vu Thien; Emmanuel Grimprel; Jean-Claude Petit
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: current strategies for diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  Munshi Moyenuddin; John C Williamson; Christopher A Ohl
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2002-08

4.  Evaluation of tcdB real-time PCR in a three-step diagnostic algorithm for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Ann M Larson; Angela M Fung; Ferric C Fang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Performance of the TechLab C. DIFF CHEK-60 enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in combination with the C. difficile Tox A/B II EIA kit, the Triage C. difficile panel immunoassay, and a cytotoxin assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  Heather Snell; Meredith Ramos; Sue Longo; Michael John; Zafar Hussain
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Is a two-step glutamate dehyrogenase antigen-cytotoxicity neutralization assay algorithm superior to the premier toxin A and B enzyme immunoassay for laboratory detection of Clostridium difficile?

Authors:  Peter H Gilligan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Laboratory approaches to infectious diarrhea.

Authors:  D K Turgeon; T R Fritsche
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 8.  Rational Therapy of Clostridium difficile Infections.

Authors:  Peter M Keller; Marko H Weber
Journal:  Viszeralmedizin       Date:  2014-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.