Literature DB >> 10946808

Haemostatic changes in systemic inflammatory response syndrome during continuous renal replacement therapy.

N García-Fernández1, F J Lavilla, E Rocha, A Purroy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endothelial damage and hemostatic imbalance play an important role in the evolution of the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) into the Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome (MODS). In Acute Renal Failure associated with SIRS, different types of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapies (CRRT) may give non-renal benefits by modifying the levels of some factors related to those disturbances.
METHODS: Forty patients with SIRS-associated ARF were randomised to receive either continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) or continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) for the first 24 h. Afterwards the CRRT method was reversed. The group treated with CVVH moved to CVVHDF and that treated with CVVHDF to CVVH for the next 24 h. Plasma levels of: von Willebrand Factor (vWF), thrombomodulin, plasminogen activity inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1: antigen and activity), tissue type plasminogen activator (t-PA: antigen), prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2) and thrombin-antithrombin complexes (TAT) were measured previously to CRRT (base-line), and after 24 and 48 hours of therapy. Multivariate ANOVA was the statistical method used.
RESULTS: In the MANOVA study a significant decrease in PAI-1 activity during the treatment procedure was observed (horizontality p <0.05). PAI-1 antigen showed a tendency to decrease although without statististical significance. There were no significantly different changes in the other factors analysed during either CRRT (parallelism p >0.05). At the base-line point, all the factors were higher than normal values in healthy adults.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that CRRT, in patients with SIRS, may promote a decrease in PAI-1 and consequently, a better outcome. There were no differences between the CVVH and the CVVHDF methods regarding the factors analysed. The present data confirms that there is an important endothelial and hemostatic dysfunction in SIRS from the early phases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10946808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nephrol        ISSN: 1121-8428            Impact factor:   3.902


  4 in total

Review 1.  [Continuous dialysis and hemofiltration. More than a kidney replacement method?].

Authors:  M Girndt; H Köhler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Antithrombin level and circuit thrombosis during hemofiltration after cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  H Lanquetot; T Leprince; S Ragot; C Boinot; C Jayle; R Robert; L Macchi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Timing of renal replacement therapy initiation for acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Alicia Isabel I Fayad; Daniel G Buamscha; Agustín Ciapponi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-18

Review 4.  Hemofiltration compared to hemodialysis for acute kidney injury: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jan O Friedrich; Ron Wald; Sean M Bagshaw; Karen E A Burns; Neill K J Adhikari
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 9.097

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.