Literature DB >> 10946784

Living kidney donation: recovery and return to activities of daily living.

T G Peters1, S M Repper, K W Jones, G W Walker, M Vincent, R D Hunter.   

Abstract

To determine donor nephrectomy outcomes, a one page 20-item survey of 42 cases was reviewed, including demographics, intervals to normal activities (e.g., driving a car, returning to work), and an open inquiry about the donation process. Hospital records were also reviewed. Nephrectomy under general anesthesia was through an anterior flank, extra-retroperitoneal approach with postoperative epidural pain control. Early self-care, progressive ambulation, and prescriptive pulmonary care were undertaken to facilitate recovery. Length of stay averaged 3.4 (range 2-8) d, and mean hospitalization charge was $15 169 (range $10 733-S29 579). Thirty-four donors were employed outside the home; 18 (53%) returned to work within 4 wk, and the average duration away from work was 4.6 wk (range 6 d 10 wk). Within 2 wk, 25 (59%) were driving an automobile. Usual activities of daily living were fully performed by all donors at a mean of 4.8 wk (minimum 5 d). Forty respondents would donate again, and one might; one did not respond to this question. None reported intermediate or long-term disabilities and all reported return to their pre-donation level of activity. With the anterior extra-retroperitoneal nephrectomy, most donors were out of the hospital within 4 d, were driving within 2 wk, and returned to gainful employment within 4 wk. Living kidney donation, as viewed by the donors, was a positive experience, which appeared to disrupt their lives minimally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10946784     DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-0012.2000.14041302.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transplant        ISSN: 0902-0063            Impact factor:   2.863


  6 in total

1.  Fatal and nonfatal hemorrhagic complications of living kidney donation.

Authors:  Amy L Friedman; Thomas G Peters; Kenneth W Jones; L Ebony Boulware; Lloyd E Ratner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Quality of life following living donor nephrectomy comparing classical flank incision and anterior vertical mini-incision.

Authors:  Steffan Jackobs; Thomas Becker; Rainer Lück; Mark D Jäger; Björn Nashan; Wilfried Gwinner; Anke Schwarz; Jürgen Klempnauer; Michael Neipp
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Successful first swap renal transplant in a public hospital.

Authors:  Vaishali Chaskar; Shrikanta Oak; Abhishek Kesarwani; Divya Darshini; Madhu Garasia
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2016-10

4.  Lower rate of delayed graft function is observed when epidural analgesia for living donor nephrectomy is administered.

Authors:  Wolfgang Baar; Ulrich Goebel; Hartmut Buerkle; Bernd Jaenigen; Kai Kaufmann; Sebastian Heinrich
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on pain, walking function, respiratory muscle strength and vital capacity in kidney donors: a protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thiago Tafarel Galli; Luciana Dias Chiavegato; Nathália Risso Santiago; Richard Eloin Liebano
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 6.  Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a step forward in kidney transplantation?

Authors:  George Skrekas; Vassilios E Papalois; Michail Mitsis; Nadey S Hakim
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2003 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.