Literature DB >> 10946349

Psychosocial factors predicting BRCA1/BRCA2 testing decisions in members of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families.

B B Biesecker1, N Ishibe, D W Hadley, T R Giambarresi, R G Kase, C Lerman, J P Struewing.   

Abstract

Although BRCA1/2 testing has increasingly entered clinical practice, much is to be learned about the most effective ways to provide counseling to persons potentially interested in receiving test results. The purpose of this study was to identify factors affecting genetic testing decisions in a cohort of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) families presented with the choice to undergo testing. Relatives in these families are known to carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Sociodemographics, personality traits, and family functioning were self-assessed using validated psychometric instruments at baseline. Among 172 individuals who participated in pretest education and counseling, 135 (78%) chose to undergo genetic testing and 37 (22%) chose not to be tested. Individuals who chose to undergo genetic testing were more likely to be older (> or =40 years), to have lower levels of optimism, and to report higher levels of cohesiveness in their families. A better understanding of factors that influence interest in predictive testing may help to inform the counseling that occurs prior to genetic testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10946349     DOI: 10.1002/1096-8628(20000814)93:4<257::aid-ajmg1>3.0.co;2-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  34 in total

1.  Uptake of BRCA1 genetic testing in adult sisters and daughters of known mutation carriers in Norway.

Authors:  Trine Levin Bodd; Jon Reichelt; Ketil Heimdal; Pal Moller
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Methodology in longitudinal studies on psychological effects of predictive DNA testing: a review.

Authors:  R Timman; T Stijnen; A Tibben
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Acceptance of genetic testing for hereditary breast ovarian cancer among study enrollees from an African American kindred.

Authors:  Anita Yeomans Kinney; Sara Ellis Simonsen; Bonnie Jeanne Baty; Diptasri Mandal; Susan L Neuhausen; Kate Seggar; Rich Holubkov; Ken Smith
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Timing and context: important considerations in the return of genetic results to research participants.

Authors:  Kate A McBride; Nina Hallowell; Martin H N Tattersall; Judy Kirk; Mandy L Ballinger; David M Thomas; Gillian Mitchell; Mary-Anne Young
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-05-26

6.  Correlates of depressive symptoms among women seeking cancer genetic counseling and risk assessment at a high-risk cancer clinic.

Authors:  Molly Middlecamp Kodl; Judith W Lee; Alicia K Matthews; Shelly A Cummings; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Health beliefs associated with readiness for genetic counseling among high risk breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Maija Reblin; Monica L Kasting; Kelli Nam; Courtney L Scherr; Jongphil Kim; Ram Thapa; Cathy D Meade; M Catherine Lee; Tuya Pal; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.431

8.  Experiences and decisions that motivate women at increased risk of breast cancer to participate in an experimental screening program.

Authors:  Michelle Proulx; Marie-Dominique Beaulieu; Christine Loignon; Marie-Hélène Mayrand; Christine Maugard; Nathalie Bellavance; Diane Provencher
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Disclosure of genetics research results after the death of the patient participant: a qualitative study of the impact on relatives.

Authors:  E Ormondroyd; C Moynihan; M Watson; C Foster; S Davolls; A Ardern-Jones; R Eeles
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  A decade of genetic counseling in frontotemporal dementia affected families: few counseling requests and much familial opposition to testing.

Authors:  S R Riedijk; M F N Niermeijer; D Dooijes; A Tibben
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.