BACKGROUND: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), which is mainly induced by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, is a cause of significant morbidity and mortality for patients undergoing liver transplantation, especially when it is detected at such an advanced stage as monoclonal malignant lymphoma. METHODS: In this series, 6 of 22 liver transplant patients suffered from EBV infection. We tested quantitative DNA (Qt-DNA) by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), qualitative DNA in plasma (Q1-pDNA) by PCR, and EBV-encoded mRNA 1 (EBER 1) by in situ hybridization to clarify which of them is a better marker for the early diagnosis and prediction of EBV-associated disorders. RESULTS: Four had signs or symptoms of PTLD, but 2 did not develop individualized lymphoid lesions. In all patients, both Qt-DNA and EBER 1 exceeded the cut-off level of 10(2.5) copies/microg DNA and 0.002%, respectively, at the time of diagnosis. In 2 patients, when Qt-DNA had a poor decline, EBER 1, even if it seemed to decrease after antiviral therapy, increased again after a few months and the clinical symptoms recurred. In 2 patients, Qt-DNA and EBER 1 increased again after a few months of antiviral therapy, and Q1-pDNA remained positive, whereas, in 3 patients, no reaction of EBV could be detected once Q1-pDNA became negative, even after the cessation of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that real-time PCR for Qt-DNA was more sensitive to the real-time activity of EBV and that Q1-pDNA could indicate when to stop antiviral therapy.
BACKGROUND: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), which is mainly induced by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, is a cause of significant morbidity and mortality for patients undergoing liver transplantation, especially when it is detected at such an advanced stage as monoclonal malignant lymphoma. METHODS: In this series, 6 of 22 liver transplant patients suffered from EBV infection. We tested quantitative DNA (Qt-DNA) by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), qualitative DNA in plasma (Q1-pDNA) by PCR, and EBV-encoded mRNA 1 (EBER 1) by in situ hybridization to clarify which of them is a better marker for the early diagnosis and prediction of EBV-associated disorders. RESULTS: Four had signs or symptoms of PTLD, but 2 did not develop individualized lymphoid lesions. In all patients, both Qt-DNA and EBER 1 exceeded the cut-off level of 10(2.5) copies/microg DNA and 0.002%, respectively, at the time of diagnosis. In 2 patients, when Qt-DNA had a poor decline, EBER 1, even if it seemed to decrease after antiviral therapy, increased again after a few months and the clinical symptoms recurred. In 2 patients, Qt-DNA and EBER 1 increased again after a few months of antiviral therapy, and Q1-pDNA remained positive, whereas, in 3 patients, no reaction of EBV could be detected once Q1-pDNA became negative, even after the cessation of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that real-time PCR for Qt-DNA was more sensitive to the real-time activity of EBV and that Q1-pDNA could indicate when to stop antiviral therapy.
Authors: M J Espy; J R Uhl; L M Sloan; S P Buckwalter; M F Jones; E A Vetter; J D C Yao; N L Wengenack; J E Rosenblatt; F R Cockerill; T F Smith Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: Jaythoon Hassan; Jonathan Dean; Cillian F De Gascun; Michael Riordan; Clodagh Sweeney; Jeff Connell; Atif Awan Journal: J Nephrol Date: 2017-11-28 Impact factor: 3.902
Authors: Seema Naik; Kristy Tayapongsak; Katherine Robbins; Cyrus Koresh Manavi; Mark J Pettenati; David D Grier Journal: Case Rep Oncol Date: 2013-01-08