BACKGROUND: Cross-cultural comparison of mental health service utilisation and costs is complicated by the heterogeneity of service systems. For data to be locally meaningful yet internationally comparable, a carefully constructed approach to its collection is required. AIMS: To develop a research method and instrument for the collection of data on the service utilisation and related characteristics of people with mental disorders, as the basis for calculating the costs of care. METHOD: Various approaches to the collection of service use data and key stages of instrument development were identified in order to select the most appropriate methods. RESULTS: Based on previous work, and following translation and cross-cultural validation, an instrument was developed: the Client Socio-Demographic and Service Receipt Inventory--European Version (CSSRI-EU). This was subsequently administered to 404 people with schizophrenia across five countries. CONCLUSION: The CSSRI-EU provides a standardised yet adaptable method for collating service receipt and associated data alongside assessment of patient outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Cross-cultural comparison of mental health service utilisation and costs is complicated by the heterogeneity of service systems. For data to be locally meaningful yet internationally comparable, a carefully constructed approach to its collection is required. AIMS: To develop a research method and instrument for the collection of data on the service utilisation and related characteristics of people with mental disorders, as the basis for calculating the costs of care. METHOD: Various approaches to the collection of service use data and key stages of instrument development were identified in order to select the most appropriate methods. RESULTS: Based on previous work, and following translation and cross-cultural validation, an instrument was developed: the Client Socio-Demographic and Service Receipt Inventory--European Version (CSSRI-EU). This was subsequently administered to 404 people with schizophrenia across five countries. CONCLUSION: The CSSRI-EU provides a standardised yet adaptable method for collating service receipt and associated data alongside assessment of patient outcomes.
Authors: Joachim Klosterkötter; Stephan Ruhrmann; Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Raimo K R Salokangas; Don Linszen; Max Birchwood; Georg Juckel; Anthony Morrison; José Luis Vázquèz-Barquero; Martin Hambrecht; Heinrich VON Reventlow Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Muhammad Ajmal Zahid; J U Ohaeri; A S Elshazly; M A Basiouny; H M Hamoda; R Varghese Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2009-09-02 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Juan V Luciano; Ana Fernández; Alejandra Pinto-Meza; Leila Luján; Juan A Bellón; Javier García-Campayo; María T Peñarrubia; Rita Fernández; Marta Sanavia; María E Blanco; Josep M Haro; Diego J Palao; Antoni Serrano-Blanco Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Christine Buttorff; Rebecca S Hock; Helen A Weiss; Smita Naik; Ricardo Araya; Betty R Kirkwood; Daniel Chisholm; Vikram Patel Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2012-09-14 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Matthias Schützwohl; Andrea Koch; Nadine Koslowski; Bernd Puschner; Elke Voß; Hans Joachim Salize; Andrea Pfennig; Anke Vogel Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2016-03-07 Impact factor: 4.328