Literature DB >> 10944576

New ideas about binocular coordination of eye movements: is there a chameleon in the primate family tree?

W M King1, W Zhou.   

Abstract

Many animals with laterally placed eyes, such as chameleons, move their eyes independently of one another. In contrast, primates with frontally placed eyes and binocular vision must move them together so that both eyes are aimed at the same point in visual space. Is binocular coordination an innate feature of how our brains are wired, or have we simply learned to move our eyes together? This question sparked a controversy in the 19(th) century between two eminent German scientists, Ewald Hering and Hermann von Helmholtz. Hering took the position that binocular coordination was innate and vigorously challenged von Helmholtz's view that it was learned. Hering won the argument and his hypothesis, known as Hering's Law of Equal Innervation, became generally accepted. New evidence suggests, however, that similar to chameleons, primates may program movements of each eye independently. Binocular coordination is achieved by a neural network at the motor periphery comprised of motoneurons and specialized interneurons located near or in the cranial nerve nuclei that innervate the extraocular muscles. It is assumed that this network must be trained and calibrated during infancy and probably throughout life in order to maintain the precise binocular coordination characteristic of primate eye movements despite growth, aging effects, and injuries to the eye movement neuromuscular system. Malfunction of this network or its ability to adaptively learn may be a contributing cause of strabismus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10944576     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0185(20000815)261:4<153::AID-AR4>3.0.CO;2-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec        ISSN: 0003-276X


  21 in total

1.  Roles of the cerebellum in pursuit-vestibular interactions.

Authors:  Kikuro Fukushima
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Does orbital proprioception contribute to gaze stability during translation?

Authors:  Min Wei; Nan Lin; Shawn D Newlands
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Cells in the supraoculomotor area in monkeys with strabismus show activity related to the strabismus angle.

Authors:  Vallabh E Das
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Responses of cells in the midbrain near-response area in monkeys with strabismus.

Authors:  Vallabh E Das
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Motor nucleus activity fails to predict extraocular muscle forces in ocular convergence.

Authors:  Joel M Miller; Ryan C Davison; Paul D Gamlin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Responses of medial rectus motoneurons in monkeys with strabismus.

Authors:  Anand C Joshi; Vallabh E Das
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Functional anatomy of human extraocular muscles during fusional divergence.

Authors:  Joseph L Demer; Robert A Clark
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Evidence against the facilitation of the vergence command during saccade-vergence interactions.

Authors:  Tal Hendel; Moshe Gur
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging of differential compartmental function of horizontal rectus extraocular muscles during conjugate and converged ocular adduction.

Authors:  Joseph L Demer; Robert A Clark
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Strabismus and the Oculomotor System: Insights from Macaque Models.

Authors:  Vallabh E Das
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 6.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.