Literature DB >> 10944063

Wide variation in the number of different drugs prescribed by general practitioners. A prescription database study.

L Bjerrum1, U Bergman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the number of different drugs prescribed per dispensing unit and to analyse the influence of practice characteristics on this number.
DESIGN: Register analysis based on the Odense Pharmacoepidemiological Database (OPED).
SETTING: General practices in the County of Funen, Demnark.
SUBJECTS: 173 general practices (99 single-handed and 74 group practices). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of different drugs prescribed per dispensing unit.
RESULTS: The number of different drugs prescribed per dispensing unit varied nearly fourfold (range 102-381) and four practice characteristics were able to predict 74% of this variation. Practices with several doctors, a high number of patients listed per doctor, a high percentage of elderly individuals, and a heavy workload showed the highest number of different drugs prescribed.
CONCLUSION: As the quality of drug prescribing is associated with the use of a limited number of drugs, it is suggested that GPs should agree on a formulary containing the most essential drugs in primary health care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10944063     DOI: 10.1080/028134300750018972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care        ISSN: 0281-3432            Impact factor:   2.581


  9 in total

1.  Narrow and wide prescribers among general practitioners: a cohort study of drug formularies used for new treatments.

Authors:  Allan Buusman; Jakob Kragstrup; Morten Andersen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-06-17       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Pharmaceutical care and its relationship to prescribing behaviour of general practitioners.

Authors:  Paul E M Muijrers; Richard P T M Grol; Jildou Sijbrandij; Rob Janknegt; J André Knottnerus
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2006-11-17

3.  Factors influencing GPs' choice between drugs in a therapeutic drug group. A qualitative study.

Authors:  Allan Buusman; Morten Andersen; Camilla Merrild; Beth Elverdam
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.581

4.  General practitioners choose within a narrow range of drugs when initiating new treatments: a cohort study of cardiovascular drug formularies.

Authors:  Allan Buusman; Jakob Kragstrup; Morten Andersen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Prescribing indicators. Development and validation of guideline-based prescribing indicators as an instrument to measure the variation in the prescribing behaviour of general practitioners.

Authors:  Paul E M Muijrers; Rob Janknegt; Jildou Sijbrandij; Richard P T M Grol; J André Knottnerus
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Which Medication Is the Patient Taking at Admission to the Emergency Ward? Still Unclear Despite the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register.

Authors:  Ida Engqvist; Katja Wyss; Charlotte Asker-Hagelberg; Ulf Bergman; Ingegerd Odar-Cederlöf; Carl-Olav Stiller; Jessica Fryckstedt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  How many medications do doctors in primary care use? An observational study of the DU90% indicator in primary care in England.

Authors:  Chiamaka Chiedozie; Mark E Murphy; Tom Fahey; Frank Moriarty
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Arterial blood gas analysis: as safe as we think? A multicentre historical cohort study.

Authors:  Sacha C Rowling; Marianne Fløjstrup; Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen; Bjarke Viberg; Christian Hallenberg; Jes Sanddal Lindholt; Andreas Alberg-Fløjborg; Prabath W B Nanayakkara; Mikkel Brabrand
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2022-02-28

9.  Determinants of the range of drugs prescribed in general practice: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Dinny H de Bakker; Dayline S V Coffie; Eibert R Heerdink; Liset van Dijk; Peter P Groenewegen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.